Pearson - from the Mail

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeff

Administrator
Staff member
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...on-makes-players-wear-heart-monitors-bed.html


It's not very often people feel sorry for footballers' WAGs.

But I think everyone should make an exception as far as Leicester City's are concerned.

If you are the other half of a well-toned, professional athlete who is worshipped and paid by the thousand, there shouldn't be too many drawbacks.

But when you may have gone up for an early night and are settling into your satin sheets, the sight of your man getting into bed wearing a heart monitor can be viewed as something of a turn-off.

Yes, that's right. Leicester City's players wear them to bed.

The use of heart monitors isn't new. They've been used for quite some time now.

But when the success of a manager is dissected, what will be seen is that Nigel Pearson is a total convert to science in sport.

Blood tests are taken regularly and his backroom staff is second-to-none, all clued up with the latest gadgets and gismos that, I'm sorry, the modern-day player wants.

For, if they are to believe the hype that they are athletes, it then follows that they want to be treated accordingly.

It may be a hallmark of the work carried out at the Football Association, where Pearson was schooled for a while, that he learned the importance - or decided himself - upon the importance of that strain of management.

It has also been noted that Leicester aren't picking up soft-muscle tissue injuries with the same frequency. Three hamstring strains is about the job lot of it at the moment.

Of course, this minutae was not highlighted when the Foxes were dropping out of the Championship.

Mind you, it was difficult to take down all the goings-on during a couple of seasons when Milan Mandaric needed a turnstile instead of a manager's door, never mind one on the dressing-room.

Sometimes there is a convergence of right man, right place, right time. It happened at West Brom almost a decade ago now when Gary Megson banged a few heads together (metaphorically speaking). And that is clearly what has happened at the Walkers Stadium.

Leicester City desperately needed stability. Pearson provided more than that by securing promotion at his first attempt.

It was an achievement that should have earned more praise than it did. True, the Foxes' wage bill was large. But Nottingham Forest and Leeds United haven't been paying peanuts and neither of those clubs returned at the first time of asking.

He then acted shrewdly in the market during the summer and, with the likes of Ritchie Wellens, a £1.25m purchase that largely slipped by the radar during the summer, is prospering. Not to mention the success of his forays into the loan market with Messrs Waghorn and McGivern.

The arrival at the club of American consultants, employed to review what 'revenue streams' might be generated from outside Leicestershire co-incided with Edgar Davids' proposed signing. The Dutchman boasts an American agent, too.

This Foxes' boss isn't really interested in publicity stunts, which I'm far from convinced that wasn't.

Pearson has got the makings, he really has. He's watched the good, bad and ugly during the years and must know what it is that makes a good manager.

He was humble and gracious when picking up an award from the Midlands' Football Writers' a few months ago, paying tribute to the coaching and scouting staff around him before being the life and soul. (Difficult to believe, but totally true).

If I had to nit-pick, I'd just say that Nigel's policy with the media is flawed. He is off-ish. It's his prerogative to do as he sees fit.

He recently commented to a colleague: 'I won't get the sack for being grumpy with you lot, I'll get the sack for losing football matches.'

On the face of it, that statement is absolutely true.

But it's a fact of life that no manager wins every game. And unless you can deliver sustained success, everyone is kicked out sooner or later.

When times are sticky, your pals in the local media will look after you.

And if you are a manager that wants to progress, those elsewhere will champion your cause and build a reputation for you.

Steve Bruce benefited ten-fold when he was going through it at Birmingham City. And he has moved onwards and upwards.

If Pearson does make it to the Premier League, you will become one of the 20 most high-profile figures in football.

And your opinion on referees, other players and managers, will then become a source of interest. And if you don't help the media carry out their jobs, why should they help you?

Ignore its power at your peril. Even Sir Alex Ferguson uses and abuses us. Which, after all, is what we are there for.

Otherwise, Pearson's star is certainly in the ascendancy. He's certainly one I'd be keeping a heathy eye upon if I were a Premier League chairman.
 
Great stuff about Pearson. Bag of chips on the Journo's shoulder though because NP is not funny like Holloway!
 
I realise that modern Leicester City footballers are pure and unsullied - even monastic. I just wonder how any monitor would have kept pace with Frankie Worthington.
 
This is all well and good, but that journo clearly didn't know that the reserves have just lost 4-0 to some no-mark loser team

He wouldn't be so praising of Pearson had he known that little fact, I bet you.......
 
Great stuff about Pearson. Bag of chips on the Journo's shoulder though because NP is not funny like Holloway!


NP is not funny? When a journo tells him that people are interested in his team selection (or whatever), NP is likely to reply, "good for them". Don't tell me you're not amused by that.

Holloway was funny in a CBeebies kind of way - Pearson knows what comedy should really be about.
 
What a shit article. First of all talking about how the merits of sports science werent talked about when we were relegated even though the current set up wasn't there, then moaning about how he will never be successful if he isn't big buddies with the media. crock of shit.
 
NP is not funny? When a journo tells him that people are interested in his team selection (or whatever), NP is likely to reply, "good for them". Don't tell me you're not amused by that.

Holloway was funny in a CBeebies kind of way - Pearson knows what comedy should really be about.
To the unbiased eye, Pearson is having the last laugh.
 
Looks like NP has turned down an interview with the Mail and so they have a had a little dig at him.
 
NP is not funny? When a journo tells him that people are interested in his team selection (or whatever), NP is likely to reply, "good for them". Don't tell me you're not amused by that.

Holloway was funny in a CBeebies kind of way - Pearson knows what comedy should really be about.

Totally agree. Holloway never made me laugh. He spouted quotable quotes, but he didn't make me laugh. I have laughed out loud at Pearson's interviews several times. It's his deadpan delivery and snide cynicism and his hatred of the media in general make him so funny.

Remember when Stringer was starting to tell him his managerial stats and he let out a disgusted sigh. :icon_lol:
 
If I had to nit-pick, I'd just say that Nigel's policy with the media is flawed. He is off-ish. It's his prerogative to do as he sees fit.

He recently commented to a colleague: 'I won't get the sack for being grumpy with you lot, I'll get the sack for losing football matches.'

On the face of it, that statement is absolutely true.

But it's a fact of life that no manager wins every game. And unless you can deliver sustained success, everyone is kicked out sooner or later.

When times are sticky, your pals in the local media will look after you.

In other words 'give us an interview or we're going to make life hard for you'.
 
Totally agree. Holloway never made me laugh. He spouted quotable quotes, but he didn't make me laugh. I have laughed out loud at Pearson's interviews several times. It's his deadpan delivery and snide cynicism and his hatred of the media in general make him so funny.

Remember when Stringer was starting to tell him his managerial stats and he let out a disgusted sigh. :icon_lol:
Haha I just used to cringe at Holloway because he made such a tit out of himself, Pearson doesen't really make me laugh but he is a class manager and I love him for that!
 
I'm liking Mr Pearson more and more each day

Blog from a complete and utter **** :


A difficult day at the office (well, press conference)
Thursday, November 05, 2009, 17:33Comment on this story

​It was the pre-West Brom press conference down the club today and it has probably been one of the most difficult days since I joined the Mercury.
Nigel Pearson’s dislike for the media is well documented and it was quite apparent today. He didn’t want to answer many questions, and even said he didn’t want to talk in any detail about West Brom, which seemed strange as they are the team City are playing on Saturday and it was the pre-match press conference.
What made it stranger was that I was ticked off by a City person for asking Jack Hobbs about Joe Mattock, the man I am sure all the fans are interested in and talking about at the moment. I was told to stick to questions about West Brom, so when Nigel said he wasn’t talking about Albion then it left me with just one question – so what are we supposed to talk about?
When we are invited to the pressers by the club it is our opportunity – and we don’t get that many of them – to ask the questions we believe the fans would like asked. Yes, I work for the Mercury, but our customers are the supporters. It is the fans who buy our newspaper and, therefore, drive our news agenda. If we think you are interested, we will ask the question because we are providing a service for the supporters, not the club.
In a city with one club and one newspaper, I believe it is vital the two look after each other because if the local paper doesn’t support the club (without losing sight of its objectivity and independence), and the club doesn’t support its best and most regular source of contact with its fans, then no one else will.
I had more laughs and it was a more enjoyable experience last season covering West Brom as they headed towards relegation. Not because they were enjoying the experience, far from it.
On the pitch, it is a long time since things have been as good as they are now at City. We should all be enjoying it. I am sure the fans are enjoying watching their team win most weeks. That is to Nigel Pearson's credit because he has shaped a very good football team. There is no question he is a very, very good manager.
But Leicester City just doesn’t feel like a club that is enjoying itself.

http://www.thebluearmy.co.uk/tanner...onference/article-1487430-detail/article.html
 
Last edited:
Journalists have a habit of placing so much importance on themselves that they lose sight of who and what matters.

What a tosser.

Why would they not allow the Mattock question? How strange.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226
Back
Top