People That Piss You Off

[highland fox]

whats gavin and tracey???

Programme with a big fat man in

 

[Yorkshire Vixen]

do you mean gavin and stacey??

 

[highland fox]

do you mean gavin and stacey??

Yeah and them,he gets about doesn't he,that Gavin ?

 

[bocadillo]

do you mean gavin and stacey??

eeerrr... Yes.
:icon_redf



But in my defence, I will say that I was led.

 

[highland fox]

Which one does he play in it anyway ? Gavin,Stacey or Tracey ?

 

[Matt_B]

Which one does he play in it anyway ? Gavin,Stacey or Tracey ?

Smithy

 

[camberwell fox]

Smithy

People who say over 100%, Louis feckin Walsh for example

 

[Cate Fox]

People who say over 100%, Louis feckin Walsh for example

The "you've made that song your own" comment annoys me even more...

 

[Singth]

The "you've made that song your own" comment annoys me even more...

Louis Walsh is a little weirdo. He should only be allowed out at Christmas when he's helping Santa.

 

[camberwell fox]

Louis Walsh is a little weirdo. He should only be allowed out at Christmas when he's humping Santa.

you dirty little man! :icon_lol::icon_bigg

 

[Leesoh]

People who say over 100%, Louis feckin Walsh for example

The other half moaning about people who say over 100% pisses me off. Whilst I agree with him, he only needs to tell me once.

 

[Macky]

Smithy

People who say over 100%, Louis feckin Walsh for example

What has that got to do with Smiffy?

Also, what's wrong with saying 'over 100%'? Do you mean a percentage higher than 100? If so, there's nothing wrong with that at all.
Percentages do not have to be less than 100.

 

[Blue Maniac]

What has that got to do with Smiffy?

Also, what's wrong with saying 'over 100%'? Do you mean a percentage higher than 100? If so, there's nothing wrong with that at all.
Percentages do not have to be less than 100.

It depends Mackster. Obviously something can go up by, say, 125%, but equally obviously it cannot go down by that much.

The problem seems to arise when people try to give numerical values to unquantifiable variables, eg effort, talent, and (in football parlance) fitness.

 

[Macky]

The problem seems to arise when people try to give numerical values to unquantifiable variables, eg effort, talent, and (in football parlance) fitness.

Absolutely, that's utter bollock talk, but as long as it's clear what 100% represents, values greater than 100 are perfectly acceptable. It's just a way of expressing a fraction and I like vulgarity.

 

[Jeff]

It's just a way of expressing a fraction and I like vulgarity.

I ½ agree with you.

 

[Macky]

I ½ agree with you.

Which is 154% more than usual

 

[Blue Maniac]

Which is 154% more than usual

a²+b²=c²

 

[Darth Vodka]

Which is 154% more than usual

you do know that 88.2% of all statistics are made up?

 

[Blue Maniac]

you do know that 88.2% of all statistics are made up?

91.6% of people don't realise that figure was arrived at in 1933. Nowadays, the percentage is closer to 95.4%.

 

[Siouxsie]

91.6% of people don't realise that figure was arrived at in 1933. Nowadays, the percentage is closer to 95.4%.

That's inflation for you. I blame Gordon Brown.