gagandeep said:Graz said:Babylon said:Graz said:Connolly should be good, not sure about Campbell :?
Still, if we have those players, I'm sure it will be Dublin and Connolly first choice, so we don't have to worry too much about Campbell.
That means we'll have Dublin, Connolly, Campbell, Benjamin and Morris (and Wright and Petrescu) as strikers right? I still think we need 1 more.
bloody hell you only play 2 at a time!!!
Yeah, but I'm not sure if either Dublin or Campbell would be able to play a full 90, plus I'm not sure how good Campbell will be and Morris has injury problems and hasn't played a game for us yet.
Actually though, people were suprised how well our strikers did last season, and I'm sure the coaching staff will be able to get the new lot doing well too, and if Wright and Petrescu do get to play we will have enough. And I forgot Scowcroft too. Yeah you're right then, we have enough strikers
we might have enough but do any compare to bent, dickov and sir les?
i think the answers no
Babylon said:gagandeep said:Graz said:Babylon said:Graz said:Connolly should be good, not sure about Campbell :?
Still, if we have those players, I'm sure it will be Dublin and Connolly first choice, so we don't have to worry too much about Campbell.
That means we'll have Dublin, Connolly, Campbell, Benjamin and Morris (and Wright and Petrescu) as strikers right? I still think we need 1 more.
bloody hell you only play 2 at a time!!!
Yeah, but I'm not sure if either Dublin or Campbell would be able to play a full 90, plus I'm not sure how good Campbell will be and Morris has injury problems and hasn't played a game for us yet.
Actually though, people were suprised how well our strikers did last season, and I'm sure the coaching staff will be able to get the new lot doing well too, and if Wright and Petrescu do get to play we will have enough. And I forgot Scowcroft too. Yeah you're right then, we have enough strikers
we might have enough but do any compare to bent, dickov and sir les?
i think the answers no
Was anyone overjoyed by the signings of dickov, ferdinand and bent when they first came.....??? I think the answers probably NO. The comments on them were, 2nd division journeyman (dickov) , old has been (ferdinand), lazy so and so who blows hot and cold (bent).
Proof of the pudding is in the eating.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |