Blaarev
Well-Known Member
They’ve tried that too.They should try him on the wing then as he's shit at playing wide.
They’ve tried that too.They should try him on the wing then as he's shit at playing wide.
So did DJ Campbell. It made no difference to how utterly shit he was. Sometimes it isn't as black and white as you think.He plays one game after another, it's a radical approach.
They’ve tried that too.
You might not buy the bollocks about a prolonged run in the team, but what about the bollocks about him being played as a winger when he's a striker. I only remember him being deployed once there, in a cup game, and he certainly looked like he deserved another opportunity tbenI don't buy this bollocks about 'prolonged run' etc... it is entirely illogical. He started well back at CSKA and has continued to progress. Lots of players don't have prolonged runs but are able to contribute time after time when called upon but Musa simply did not. He was given opportunities to perform for us and failed every single one of them with the exception of his debut. No manager in his right mind could have given him more time to fail given the appalling performances he gave. Players perform differently for different clubs for many more complex reasons and with Musa I just feel he's happier there. I don't know why, perhaps it is a system thing or perhaps it's more of an emotive thing but it's more than a simple case of game time.
You lot have got short memories. How can we have given him a prolonged run in the team when he was SO shite in the opportunities he was given?
Literally zilch positives to work on.
That was the one and only occasion. Elvis Hammond had a decent 45 mins once.I watched him single handedly win the game at Goodison Park when he came on and rescued us after everyone else on the pitch was utter turd.
It wasn't a fluke, he showed what he can do when played in position
So that's the paradigm is it? Does Slimani's performance in the Carabao cup mean he is suddenly a great player? The example you cite is correct but it was the exception rather than the norm.I watched him single handedly win the game at Goodison Park when he came on and rescued us after everyone else on the pitch was utter turd.
It wasn't a fluke, he showed what he can do when played in position
Lots of players don't have prolonged runs but are able to contribute time after time when called upon .
So that's the paradigm is it? Does Slimani's performance in the Carabao cup mean he is suddenly a great player? The example you cite is correct but it was the exception rather than the norm.
Take as an example Lingard at Manchester United. He never gets a run in the team really but he delivers time and time again when he is called upon. No one can say that about Musa.
If you can't be bothered then neither can I but as a taster:Go on...
(Lingard has started 20 or so games for United this season, many of them in a row).
Slimani came on as a sub after 75mins today
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |