Puel out

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s just been pointed out to me that the 100 days of mourning ends on Thursday. Maybe that might be the time.
 
SJN-Fox said:
It’s just been pointed out to me that the 100 days of mourning ends on Thursday. Maybe that might be the time.
Click to expand...
I have been thinking something for a while and it is perhaps a bit controversial...

Vichai would have binned him by now.
 
And the controversial bit...

The look on his face after the game, I think he might have done it after West Ham at home.

I mean no disrespect obviously.
 
It's either now or the end of the season. 10 days without a game is ideal. 7 defeats in our last 10 games, including getting dumped out of both cup competitions, should be it.

However, I'm not sure if there is anyone there to make the decision and bring someone new in. Vichai made all the big calls. I don't trust anyone else to do that.

I also don't think it makes sense to recruit a new manager mid season. You only do it if you're sure the man you get is the right one, or you're desperate. And we're neither.

It doesn't make logical sense. In the summer, Benitez, Rodgers, Wagner, etc. will all be available. Many more besides, possibly even the likes of Conte or Jardim. The structure of the club will be more settled.

I don't want to watch another Puel led team but the only logical alternative is a caretaker. Who on earth makes sense there? Nobody I can think of.
 
Brown Nose said:
It's either now or the end of the season. 10 days without a game is ideal. 7 defeats in our last 10 games, including getting dumped out of both cup competitions, should be it.

However, I'm not sure if there is anyone there to make the decision and bring someone new in. Vichai made all the big calls. I don't trust anyone else to do that.

I also don't think it makes sense to recruit a new manager mid season. You only do it if you're sure the man you get is the right one, or you're desperate. And we're neither.

It doesn't make logical sense. In the summer, Benitez, Rodgers, Wagner, etc. will all be available. Many more besides, possibly even the likes of Conte or Jardim. The structure of the club will be more settled.

I don't want to watch another Puel led team but the only logical alternative is a caretaker. Who on earth makes sense there? Nobody I can think of.
Click to expand...

Pearson the only one that you could install in that way.

And I definitely don’t fancy that.
 
Skitzo said:
he's doing quite crap in Belgium, far worse than Puel is doing here
Click to expand...

I didn’t say it was a good idea. But he is someone who knows the club and players that can keep the seat warm until a proper manager shows up.

Depends how urgently they feel a change is needed.
 
Miles Away said:
I didn’t say it was a good idea. But he is someone who knows the club and players that can keep the seat warm until a proper manager shows up.

Depends how urgently they feel a change is needed.
Click to expand...
there's no way he'd take it under those circumstances, only way I see Pearson working for LCFC again is as a DOF or similar position
 
Pearson would be just swapping one Premier League duffer for another.
 
SilverFox said:
And the controversial bit...

The look on his face after the game, I think he might have done it after West Ham at home.

I mean no disrespect obviously.
Click to expand...
Yep, said this before. Stringer was making a big thing out of it after the game and I reckon he was right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top