Puel out

[M17TT C]

He's lost more league games than he's won.

Yes he may have but he has won more games than he has lost.

 

[Jeff]

Yes he may have but he has won more games than he has lost.

The article was talking about league games, so it was accurate.

 

[homer]

The article was talking about league games, so it was accurate.

Yeah, but those facts aren't the right facts

What if we looked at pre season friendly games as well, and five a side training matches

Then we'd see the facts we really want

 

[M17TT C]

But the statement of 'he has lost more matches than he has won' or whatever it is in the article, is factually incorrect.

Argue as much as you like but it is wrong.

If you looked at pre season too, it would probably be an even better record.

 

[Micky]

But the statement of 'he has lost more matches than he has won' or whatever it is in the article, is factually incorrect.

Argue as much as you like but it is wrong.

If you looked at pre season too, it would probably be an even better record.

Argue as much as you like, Puel has us playing dull as dish water football and many have had enough.

 

[Rock Fox]

Argue as much as you like, Puel has us playing dull as dish water football and many have had enough.

“It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.”
Grantland Rice

PS who calls their kid 'Grantland' ?

 

[Micky]

“It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.”
Grantland Rice

PS who calls their kid 'Grantland' ?

To add, we are also losing games to shite opposition.

 

[Robin127]

“It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.”
Grantland Rice

PS who calls their kid 'Grantland' ?

Mr and Mrs Rice.

 

[M17TT C]

Argue as much as you like, Puel has us playing dull as dish water football and many have had enough.

I'm not, nor have I ever, disputed that.

Just incorrect facts and people seeing words that aren't there.

It may be boring at times but it is solid and there is a plan that we are building for continued, sustained success rather than just chucking money at it.

Stick it out until the end of the season as changing now is likely to effect the long term plan in that we would likely resort to a panic signing of a manager rather than a well thought out and planned one.

Plus we haven't even got a chairman at the moment so we should wait and let King Power sort out their future before expecting change when it is not vitally needed right now.

 

[Blue Maniac]

“It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.”
Grantland Rice

PS who calls their kid 'Grantland' ?

Nobody. It was his middle name because it was his mother's surname.

 

[popillius]

But the statement of 'he has lost more matches than he has won' or whatever it is in the article, is factually incorrect.

Argue as much as you like but it is wrong.

If you looked at pre season too, it would probably be an even better record.

Craig Shakespeare averaged 1.38 points per game, Leicester scored more goals than they conceded while he was in charge and they won as many games as they lost. Puel averages 1.35 points per game, Leicester have lost more matches than they have won under him and their goal difference is negative.

It is very clearly a comparison on League matches. He sets that premise out by discussing points per game. That could not be clearer. In that case, the stats are correct. Surely you can use inference to deduce this?

It's pretty difficult to argue with anything at all in this article but I'm absolutely sure you'll try.

 

[Lako42]

But the statement of 'he has lost more matches than he has won' or whatever it is in the article, is factually incorrect.

No it isnt

 

[glyn]

New stat question. Is the Puel Out thread longer yet than the Pearson Out, Levein Out or Sousa Out theads? I suspect the Shakespeare Out, Eriksson Out and Ranieri Out threads were shorter.

 

[M17TT C]

No it isnt

But he has won more games than he has lost.

Strange really considering he hates cups and always tries to lose in the matches that even when considering those matches too, he's won more games then he's lost.

Quite a remarkable record really.

 

[M17TT C]

Craig Shakespeare averaged 1.38 points per game, Leicester scored more goals than they conceded while he was in charge and they won as many games as they lost. Puel averages 1.35 points per game, Leicester have lost more matches than they have won under him and their goal difference is negative.

It is very clearly a comparison on League matches. He sets that premise out by discussing points per game. That could not be clearer. In that case, the stats are correct. Surely you can use inference to deduce this?

It's pretty difficult to argue with anything at all in this article but I'm absolutely sure you'll try.

So you use a complete quote this time.

Interesting.

 

[Jeff]

Strange really considering he hates cups and always tries to lose in the matches that even when considering those matches too, he's won more games then he's lost.

The only teams he's beaten in cup games are Fleetwood (twice), Peterborough and Sheffield United. No Premier League teams.
We've only knocked Premier League teams out after drawing with them.

 

[M17TT C]

The only teams he's beaten in cup games are Fleetwood (twice), Peterborough and Sheffield United. No Premier League teams.
We've only knocked Premier League teams out after drawing with them.

So how did we get to play Man City in the league cup this year then?

 

[Jeff]

So how did we get to play Man City in the league cup this year then?

Because we drew against Wolves and Southampton.

 

[M17TT C]

Because we drew against Wolves and Southampton.

But how did we progress to the following rounds?

 

[Jeff]

But how did we progress to the following rounds?

By winning a lottery.