Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Hard to disagree with any of this:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...uel-leicester-premier-league?CMP=share_btn_tw
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...uel-leicester-premier-league?CMP=share_btn_tw
the paper can’t decide it’s position
well journalists are supposed to report facts and be impartial informers so shouldn't be giving their opinion at all, that its the job of a columnistDo you think the journalists should all have a meeting in the morning and decide what the paper's position should be on football managers?
Yeah but apart from getting the key facts on which he based his entire opening argument wrong, pretty solid article.I think they should get their facts right before publishing articles though.
Puel has won more than he has lost with us:
http://www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/claude-puel/
And we have also scored more goals than conceeded:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/cla.../1003/datum_zu/2017-10-25/datum_ab/0000-00-00
well journalists are supposed to report facts and be impartial informers so shouldn't be giving their opinion at all, that its the job of a columnist
so you'd call Jeremy Clarkson a journalist? He used to be but he is just a columnist now and has been a long time. Journalist report and investigate Columnist just write whatever comes to mind, as @M17TT C points out the basic facts this piece was based on is wrong, journalists fact are meant to check before they submit their articles too.Columnists are journalists.
so you'd call Jeremy Clarkson a journalist
If you were a footballer would you enjoy playing in our team right now?What’s your assumption based on? Vardy saying the play doesn’t suit him precisely?
If you were a footballer would you enjoy playing in our team right now?
There. There’s the assumption.
I would. But you wouldn’t enjoy watching me.If you were a footballer would you enjoy playing in our team right now?
There. There’s the assumption.
Whoever is whatever, it doesn't change the fact that Jeremy Charles Robert Clarkson is shite.
I think they should get their facts right before publishing articles though.
Puel has won more than he has lost with us:
http://www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/claude-puel/
Comprehensive and damning indictment...Hard to disagree with any of this:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...uel-leicester-premier-league?CMP=share_btn_tw
Those stats are wrong.
I think the actual numbers (league games only) are won 19, lost 20. Maybe someone could double check.
And we have also scored more goals than conceeded:
Either way, the article is still wrong as he has won more games than he has lost with us.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |