Puel out

[Skitzo]

We used to regularly leave Vardy and Mahrez on the half way line (one on each side), until Ranieri started to be more conservative with his tactics.

That’s probably why I’d forgot he did that but to blame Puel for something pretty much every manager has done here isn’t fair

 

[Ike O'Noclassed]

Remarkable we don't do it, especially considering when we lose a goal to a corner, there's hardly any comment or criticism here.

 

[Lako42]

That’s probably why I’d forgot he did that but to blame Puel for something pretty much every manager has done here isn’t fair

Can I blame him for doing it in his reign?

Or is he that ****ing clueless he's just carrying on a tradition that contributed to getting his useless predecessors sacked?

If you are saying it's not his fault because someone else once did it then I think we can see the cracks in the 'Puel in' argument quite nicely.

 

[Skitzo]

Can I blame him for doing it in his reign?

Or is he that ****ing clueless he's just carrying on a tradition that contributed to getting his useless predecessors sacked?

If you are saying it's not his fault because someone else once did it then I think we can see the cracks in the 'Puel in' argument quite nicely.

I’m saying I don’t remember people making that big a deal of it under previous managers, maybe if you Puel out lot stop getting so hysterical in your posts others might be more inclined to discuss it

 

[glyn]

We used to regularly leave Vardy and Mahrez on the half way line (one on each side), until Ranieri started to be more conservative with his tactics.

Our readiness to attack from an opposition corner was a thing of beauty. Kante and Drinkwater at the edge of the box ready to nick the second ball, pass to the other, and get our attack going straight away.

 

[Orifice]

We just don't seem to play to the strengths of the players, as many are saying.

There was a manager years ago (Clough?) that was all for holding on to the ball, the other team can't score if you have the ball.

When we have 65% possession we loose. When we have 35% we win. Or there abouts.

 

[Miles Away]

I remember a lot of people meaning about our set piece setup. It’s not new.

 

[Lako42]

I’m saying I don’t remember people making that big a deal of it under previous managers, maybe if you Puel out lot stop getting so hysterical in your posts others might be more inclined to discuss it

I've always hated it.

It's negative shit

 

[pork pie fox]

I remember we used to leave three players up there, never mind one or two.

 

[pork pie fox]

I’m saying I don’t remember people making that big a deal of it under previous managers, maybe if you Puel out lot stop getting so hysterical in your posts others might be more inclined to discuss it

I’m sure I remember posting about it before. I’m sure I remember others posting about it before, too.

 

[Brown Nose]

Mike Stowell took over responsibility for all corners for/against a couple of years ago.

I often notice Puel talk to Stowell about them during matches. They did so second half on Saturday. So I assume it's still the same set up.

We're bad at them at both ends of the pitch and have been for ages. It's been discussed on here multiple times. I've whined on about it loads.

 

[SJN-Fox]

I think the commentator said during the early part of Man City game that we’d had something like 95 corners so far this season and scored from 2 of them.

(I’m sure there are stats out there somewhere).

 

[City Fan]

The football has gone from boring, pedestrian, possession based shite to embarrassingly awful load of wank. We can’t even string two passes together.

He’s a fraud of a manager. Sack him at half time.

 

[Skitzo]

Mike Stowell took over responsibility for all corners for/against a couple of years ago.

I often notice Puel talk to Stowell about them during matches. They did so second half on Saturday. So I assume it's still the same set up.

We're bad at them at both ends of the pitch and have been for ages. It's been discussed on here multiple times. I've whined on about it loads.

if that's true it explains a lot actually

 

[Miles Away]

if that's true it explains a lot actually

Never really understood Stowells apparent iron grip at City.

 

[Skitzo]

Never really understood Stowells apparent iron grip at City.

me neither I'd sack him and recruite a world class keepers coach and someone to do the set piece stuff, all the money we spend and we're skimping on the coaching budget?

 

[Brown Nose]

Never really understood Stowells apparent iron grip at City.

Brought in by Levein in 2005. Sacked in 2007.

Then Martin Allen brought him back less than three months later and we've been stuck with him ever since.

I've never seen a keeper improve under him. He's mates with Schmeichel though so his position is untouchable.

 

[Miles Away]

Brought in by Levein in 2005. Sacked in 2007.

Then Martin Allen brought him back less than three months later and we've been stuck with him ever since.

I've never seen a keeper improve under him. He's mates with Schmeichel though so his position is untouchable.

Which would be fine if he was a goalkeeping coach. But he’s clearly got a larger remit. Baffling.

 

[Skitzo]

Brought in by Levein in 2005. Sacked in 2007.

Then Martin Allen brought him back less than three months later and we've been stuck with him ever since.

I've never seen a keeper improve under him. He's mates with Schmeichel though so his position is untouchable.

Martin Allen didn't have a clue about keeper coaches that's why

 

[Skitzo]

Which would be fine if he was a goalkeeping coach. But he’s clearly got a larger remit. Baffling.

his official job title is Goalkeeper & First Team coach, just lowball him at his next renewal so you can say to Kasper we asked him to stay and he said no OR tell Kasper to shut up and get on with it when we just sack him