Racist orgy shame caught on camera during Thailand end of season tour

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if, from a purely selfish, LCFC standpoint, the Blatter story will take a bit of heat away from us.
 
Sunday dinner in the Pearson household may be somewhat tense. Mums being mums Mrs Pearson may not understand that James future is now out of Nigel's hands.

We are told that the board will decide the player future but I am afraid I do not know who is on the board.

I have always taken it that the power structure is Nigel for the players and Susan Whelan for everything else but with Vichai and Top in overall charge. Presumably Vichai and Top are on the board but who else.

Obviously it would be wrong to prejudge the hearings. I hope they will get a fair hearing and that they will then be sacked.
 
...We are told that the board will decide the player future but I am afraid I do not know who is on the board.

I have always taken it that the power structure is Nigel for the players and Susan Whelan for everything else but with Vichai and Top in overall charge. Presumably Vichai and Top are on the board but who else.

Chairman - Vichai Raksriaksorn
Joint Vice Chairman - Aiyawatt Raksriaksorn (Top)
& Mr Liu Shilai (A Chinese entrepreneur and influential, successful businessman)

Other Board Members
CEO - Susan Whelan
Apichet Srivaddhanaprabha (Top’s brother) - currently holds the position of Assistant to Group Chairman at King Power International.

Supornthip Choungrangsee – who has been on the board since King Power took over and is often assumed to be a wife/sister, but is actually unrelated and at the time of her appointment the Mercury described as chief executive officer of Branded the Agency Co Ltd, Tippy Co Ltd and Working Diamond Co Ltd and is certainly still leading Tippy. https://instagram.com/supornthip/
 
With all this hooha about farts and bottoms and Blatter I'd totally forgotten about the Foxes Trust.
 
With all this hooha about farts and bottoms and Blatter I'd totally forgotten about the Foxes Trust.

Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.
 
Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.
Wasn't there one FT person that used to get a little narky?
 
Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.

They bought you off with the whole chains thing didn't they? It's like FIFA x 1,000.
 
Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.

Yes, the usual bait of membership numbers which always becomes a throw away joke comment (hello Camberwell Fox on this occasion), however no one ever seems bothered about how many the official supporters club, the DSA or even Union FS have.

The club would prefer a single fans organisation, but each organisation has its own areas of focus & to combine would be foolish, because if the club didn't like say something the Foxes Trust said, they could be awkward on away coaches or stadium noise initiatives if under a single organisation, so being separate removes the big stick.

You only have to look at the no talk to Stringer issue to know how things can become entrenched & drag on for months.
 
Yes, the usual bait of membership numbers which always becomes a throw away joke comment (hello Camberwell Fox on this occasion), however no one ever seems bothered about how many the official supporters club, the DSA or even Union FS have.

The club would prefer a single fans organisation, but each organisation has its own areas of focus & to combine would be foolish, because if the club didn't like say something the Foxes Trust said, they could be awkward on away coaches or stadium noise initiatives if under a single organisation, so being separate removes the big stick.

You only have to look at the no talk to Stringer issue to know how things can become entrenched & drag on for months.

To be fair I'm not a berater of the FT.
 
Tick, tock, tick, tock.

How difficult can this one be to resolve in the only way that is remotely acceptable?
 
Tick, tock, tick, tock.

How difficult can this one be to resolve in the only way that is remotely acceptable?

The young men involved will need time to brief legal counsel. It is better for the club to act slowly and properly rather than leave legal loopholes. You believe they should be sacked and I believe they should be sacked but their lawyers will argue otherwise. I do not want a situation in which they go to an employment tribunal and get a payoff through a hurried and sloppy procedure. As Milan Mandaric once said about Martin Allen "God created lawyers" - his tone suggested "What was God thinking?"

The three players will be hoping for some kind of payoff as their chances of earning good money in football have suddenly diminished. I hope they do not get one.
 
The young men involved will need time to brief legal counsel. It is better for the club to act slowly and properly rather than leave legal loopholes. You believe they should be sacked and I believe they should be sacked but their lawyers will argue otherwise. I do not want a situation in which they go to an employment tribunal and get a payoff through a hurried and sloppy procedure. As Milan Mandaric once said about Martin Allen "God created lawyers" - his tone suggested "What was God thinking?"

The three players will be hoping for some kind of payoff as their chances of earning good money in football have suddenly diminished. I hope they do not get one.

Would Pearson Jnr be entitled to a payout (should/when it ends in a sacking) as his contract ends this month anyway?
 
Would Pearson Jnr be entitled to a payout (should/when it ends in a sacking) as his contract ends this month anyway?

Not if they happen to drag it out past that point. I'd imagine they'll just let his contract run down. I still think the other two will walk rather than be pushed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1946
2Arsenal2040
3Nottm F2040
4Chelsea2036
5Newcastle2035
6Manchester C  2034
7Bournemouth2033
8Aston Villa2032
9Fulham2030
10Brighton2028
11Brentford2027
12Tottenham 2024
13Manchester U2023
14West Ham2023
15Palace2021
16Everton1917
17Wolves2016
18Ipswich2016
19Leicester2014
20Southampton206
Back
Top