Racist orgy shame caught on camera during Thailand end of season tour

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if, from a purely selfish, LCFC standpoint, the Blatter story will take a bit of heat away from us.
 
Sunday dinner in the Pearson household may be somewhat tense. Mums being mums Mrs Pearson may not understand that James future is now out of Nigel's hands.

We are told that the board will decide the player future but I am afraid I do not know who is on the board.

I have always taken it that the power structure is Nigel for the players and Susan Whelan for everything else but with Vichai and Top in overall charge. Presumably Vichai and Top are on the board but who else.

Obviously it would be wrong to prejudge the hearings. I hope they will get a fair hearing and that they will then be sacked.
 
...We are told that the board will decide the player future but I am afraid I do not know who is on the board.

I have always taken it that the power structure is Nigel for the players and Susan Whelan for everything else but with Vichai and Top in overall charge. Presumably Vichai and Top are on the board but who else.

Chairman - Vichai Raksriaksorn
Joint Vice Chairman - Aiyawatt Raksriaksorn (Top)
& Mr Liu Shilai (A Chinese entrepreneur and influential, successful businessman)

Other Board Members
CEO - Susan Whelan
Apichet Srivaddhanaprabha (Top’s brother) - currently holds the position of Assistant to Group Chairman at King Power International.

Supornthip Choungrangsee – who has been on the board since King Power took over and is often assumed to be a wife/sister, but is actually unrelated and at the time of her appointment the Mercury described as chief executive officer of Branded the Agency Co Ltd, Tippy Co Ltd and Working Diamond Co Ltd and is certainly still leading Tippy. https://instagram.com/supornthip/
 
With all this hooha about farts and bottoms and Blatter I'd totally forgotten about the Foxes Trust.
 
With all this hooha about farts and bottoms and Blatter I'd totally forgotten about the Foxes Trust.

Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.
 
Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.
Wasn't there one FT person that used to get a little narky?
 
Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.

They bought you off with the whole chains thing didn't they? It's like FIFA x 1,000.
 
Who, it has to be said in the interests of fairness, never rise to the bait on offer here and often supply useful information like the above listed construction of the board.

Yes, the usual bait of membership numbers which always becomes a throw away joke comment (hello Camberwell Fox on this occasion), however no one ever seems bothered about how many the official supporters club, the DSA or even Union FS have.

The club would prefer a single fans organisation, but each organisation has its own areas of focus & to combine would be foolish, because if the club didn't like say something the Foxes Trust said, they could be awkward on away coaches or stadium noise initiatives if under a single organisation, so being separate removes the big stick.

You only have to look at the no talk to Stringer issue to know how things can become entrenched & drag on for months.
 
Yes, the usual bait of membership numbers which always becomes a throw away joke comment (hello Camberwell Fox on this occasion), however no one ever seems bothered about how many the official supporters club, the DSA or even Union FS have.

The club would prefer a single fans organisation, but each organisation has its own areas of focus & to combine would be foolish, because if the club didn't like say something the Foxes Trust said, they could be awkward on away coaches or stadium noise initiatives if under a single organisation, so being separate removes the big stick.

You only have to look at the no talk to Stringer issue to know how things can become entrenched & drag on for months.

To be fair I'm not a berater of the FT.
 
Tick, tock, tick, tock.

How difficult can this one be to resolve in the only way that is remotely acceptable?
 
Tick, tock, tick, tock.

How difficult can this one be to resolve in the only way that is remotely acceptable?

You seem to feel this is being handled badly? Will this be like Pearson-gate where you keep banging the same drum?
 
Tick, tock, tick, tock.

How difficult can this one be to resolve in the only way that is remotely acceptable?

The young men involved will need time to brief legal counsel. It is better for the club to act slowly and properly rather than leave legal loopholes. You believe they should be sacked and I believe they should be sacked but their lawyers will argue otherwise. I do not want a situation in which they go to an employment tribunal and get a payoff through a hurried and sloppy procedure. As Milan Mandaric once said about Martin Allen "God created lawyers" - his tone suggested "What was God thinking?"

The three players will be hoping for some kind of payoff as their chances of earning good money in football have suddenly diminished. I hope they do not get one.
 
The young men involved will need time to brief legal counsel. It is better for the club to act slowly and properly rather than leave legal loopholes. You believe they should be sacked and I believe they should be sacked but their lawyers will argue otherwise. I do not want a situation in which they go to an employment tribunal and get a payoff through a hurried and sloppy procedure. As Milan Mandaric once said about Martin Allen "God created lawyers" - his tone suggested "What was God thinking?"

The three players will be hoping for some kind of payoff as their chances of earning good money in football have suddenly diminished. I hope they do not get one.

Would Pearson Jnr be entitled to a payout (should/when it ends in a sacking) as his contract ends this month anyway?
 
Would Pearson Jnr be entitled to a payout (should/when it ends in a sacking) as his contract ends this month anyway?

Not if they happen to drag it out past that point. I'd imagine they'll just let his contract run down. I still think the other two will walk rather than be pushed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top