Random News Article Thread

Log in to stop seeing adverts

When did I take power, was I voted in as a Prime Minister with a large majority by sheep and am I allowed to state what part of my campaigning manifesto contained? What a great game reinventing history is.

Of course what you are after is a simple 'no' because life appears to be that simple to you, it's either left or it's right, but that isn't the way it works. Sorry.

You'll go on to keep all other variables the same and make cheap inferences whereas my Dr Who-like appearance in the time stream will have massive repercussions.

For a starter, if you insist I change history we run the risk of losing 'The List. No one wants that. Nwets will move to Milwall not Villa, BG will be voted Politest Poster three seasons running and Steven will be posting links to rumour sites/pictures of naked young things/offensive topics. Some things may not change but you don't **** with history.

A simple question was asked of you. Would you have sent the task force to the Falklands, yes or no.

Your reply to that (repeated) question is above.

I have drawn my own conclusions.
 
A simple question was asked of you. Would you have sent the task force to the Falklands, yes or no.

Oh, can I play? Bullshit nationalism is my specialist subject. The answer is no, no I would not have sent young men to take part in killing and maiming just for the sake of a few penguins and some sheep on a rock that your country has no claim over. It was a disgusting and calculating action. Blood for votes.


What do I win?
 
Last edited:
Oh, can I play? Bullshit nationalism is my specialist subject. The answer is no, no I would not have sent young men to take part in killing and maiming just for the sake of a few penguins and some sheep on a rock that your country has no claim over. It was a disgusting and calculating action. Blood for votes.


What do I win?

Why do we have no claim over the Falklands?
 
Oh, can I play? Bullshit nationalism is my specialist subject. The answer is no, no I would not have sent young men to take part in killing and maiming just for the sake of a few penguins and some sheep on a rock that your country has no claim over. It was a disgusting and calculating action. Blood for votes.


What do I win?

So you would have ignored the wishes of the inhabitants and abandoned them to the Argentinians?

What sort of message would that have sent out. Would you let Gibraltar go too? Would you be happy with the signal that non-action would have sent out to the world?

Macky, you can argue about whether or not we should have a claim on part of the world that is so far away and I would perhaps agree. But then as now they were under our control and to let the Argentinians 'take them' like that would have been very wrong IMHO.
 
Last edited:
So you would have ignored the wishes of the inhabitants and abandoned them to the Argentinians?

What sort of message would that have sent out. Would you let Gibraltar go too? Would you be happy with the signal that non-action would have sent out to the world?

Macky, you can argue about whether or not we should have a claim on part of the world that is so far away and I would perhaps agree. But then as now they were under our control and to let the Argentinians 'take them' like that would have been very wrong IMHO.

Why do we have any rights over any part of land, including this "country"? What gives us the right other than that we took it by force at some point in our past?
 
So you would have ignored the wishes of the inhabitants and abandoned them to the Argentinians?

What sort of message would that have sent out. Would you let Gibraltar go too? Would you be happy with the signal that non-action would have sent out to the world?

Macky, you can argue about whether or not we should have a claim on part of the world that is so far away and I would perhaps agree. But then as now they were under our control and to let the Argentinians 'take them' like that would have been very wrong IMHO.

Oh, come off it man, you're just using emotive framing to set up a false dichotomy. "Abandoned them to the Argentinians"? What do you think would've happened? Would they have flayed and eaten them? Or would they have just left them to get on with shearing their sheep?
Is sending kids to kill and be killed the only possible response?

It was a tragic case of two tyrannical governments using a bleak rock to further their own political agendas. Neither of them giving two shits and a **** about the people inhabiting that bleak rock.
 
Why won't you substantiate your claim that Britain has no claim to the islands?
Macky, can I field this one?

Because you can't prove the nonexistence of anything. It's the reason the existence of an intelligent creator cannot be disproved. Not because there is one, but because you can't just point into an empty corner and say 'see, it's not there'.
 
Macky, can I field this one?

Because you can't prove the nonexistence of anything. It's the reason the existence of an intelligent creator cannot be disproved. Not because there is one, but because you can't just point into an empty corner and say 'see, it's not there'.

But the Falkland Islands do exist and it's a fact that it's a British protectorate,it's up to Macky to say why it shouldn't be.
 
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top