Rangers to go into Administration

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lako42

Well-Known Member
Fantastic, Div 3 should see more tv money really.
 

Motown Fox

Well-Known Member

Looks like Rangers' first game of the new season will be a trip to Brechin on 28 July in the Ramsdens Challenge Cup.

brechin32.jpg

How long will this stand last once the Rangers fans get at it



Here are the two big statements from the SPL release:

"It was agreed that the SPL would work with the Scottish FA, SFL and Rangers to facilitate Rangers FC taking their place in SFL Division 3 this season.

"It was agreed that Dundee FC would be invited to fill the space vacated by Rangers FC in the Clydesdale Bank Premier League."
 
Last edited:

Motown Fox

Well-Known Member
A stand-off over media rights and a possible stripping of titles threatens to scupper Rangers' hopes of Scottish Football Association membership.

The SPL want an independent commission to rule on whether Rangers broke the rules during previous campaigns by paying players with so-called side contracts.
They are due to hand over their findings to that commission on 10 August.
But Rangers fear an independent commission could strip them of titles and believe they have already been sufficiently punished.
The Rangers manager Ally McCoist has already said that he will never accept the stripping of titles.
 

Steven

Active Member
There are no consequences we are Rangers. :icon_roll
 

Motown Fox

Well-Known Member
Rangers cheating for nearly ten years

The SPL is investigating the Ibrox club's controversial use of Employee Benefit Trusts, which is also the subject of a first tier tribunal by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.
EBTs allow employers to pay money in to the trust, which is paid out to the beneficiaries as tax-free loans.
Payments from an EBT should not be made on a contractual basis because that would make them part of an employee's salary and therefore subject to tax and National Insurance.

HMRC claims Rangers' EBT scheme was a tax scam because it was contractual.
BBC Scotland has seen evidence that suggests 53 Rangers players and staff had side-letters giving undertakings to fund their EBTs with cash .
SFA registration rules state that payments received by a player solely relating to his playing activities must be fully recorded and declared.
If that does not happen, the player has been improperly registered and the norm then is for the player's team to forfeit any match in which he has participated.
Rangers won the SPL four times in the EBT period in question, in 2003, 2005, 2009 and 2010.
 

Profondo Rosso

Well-Known Member
They shouldn't be allowed in the FL tbh. They should start at the very bottom of the non-league pyramid as AFC Wimbledon did in England.
 

Biffa Bacon

Well-Known Member
They shouldn't be allowed in the FL tbh. They should start at the very bottom of the non-league pyramid as AFC Wimbledon did in England.

The 3rd division in Scotland is about Leicester senior league level.
 

Profondo Rosso

Well-Known Member
The 3rd division in Scotland is about Leicester senior league level.

The level of quality makes no difference. A new club should have to start at the very bottom. It is completely against the idea of sport to allow a new club in the FL just because of their fanbase or what club this new club formed out of. Were Gretna allowed in the league after they re-formed after liquidation?! **** were they.

Rangers should start at the very bottom of the Scottish non-league ladder, not the Scottish football league ladder.
 
Last edited:

Matt_B

Well-Known Member
The level of quality makes no difference. A new club should have to start at the very bottom. It is completely against the idea of sport to allow a new club in the FL just because of their fanbase or what club this new club formed out of. Were Gretna allowed in the league after they re-formed after liquidation?! **** were they.

Rangers should start at the very bottom of the Scottish non-league ladder, not the Scottish football league ladder.

It's really pissing me off how many people think they should still be in the SPL because it's bad for Scottish football if they're not. Surely this reliance on one/two teams is the reason the other teams can't compete.
 

GazLCFC

Active Member
As I understand it there isn't a pyramid league system in Scotland, well not in the way there is in England.
One of the agreements if they were allowed in the first division was that a proper league system would be introduced.

Also did Grenta apply to be allowed back in the SPL/SFL? If not there can't really be an argument there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top