Dour
Well-Known Member
Or, we have as many wins as we had after 5 games last season, when the first game most really expected us to win was the 6th match against Palace or the 7th against Burnley,
Ranieri
- Thread starter Blaarev
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
Or, we have as many wins as we had after 5 games last season, when the first game most really expected us to win was the 6th match against Palace or the 7th against Burnley,
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Yes, or that, Dour.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
So we should expect title-winning form?
LoopisDeLupis
Well-Known Member
It's almost impossible to make a comparison. Sooner or later we will have a run of bad results, it happens to every club. But, make Hay whilst the sun shines.
Based on what we've seen so far, we're looking pretty damned good. But we shouldn't start to expect higher than mid-table IMO
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Agree with all of that.
I think what would be progress would be more consistency. By this I mean not going on a 15+ game run without a win followed by a 7+ win and a draw out of 9.
Our current form is very good and we are playing very well (and sensibly) and of course we can't keep on winning in this vein, I just don't want the lows to be so extreme and if we need to trade that for the highs not being so acute, then so be it.
fitz
Well-Known Member
They're big in Sunderland.
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Expect what you want...but anyone trying to infer that this season's start can be directly compared to the first season in the top flight (as players bedded in) seems to me to be fatuous.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Illuminate me.
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Eh?
What you do with your gold spots is up to you. Burnish and be happy!
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Regarding why comparing the starts is not of value.
Or the lightbulb thing, that sounds good.
fitz
Well-Known Member
Stupid ****er. I meant big in what was Sunderland before they moved the borders to become a city. They even stole a waste tip off Gatesheed to be part of their City.
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Pretty sure I've already alluded to the reason why.
Ike O'Noclassed
Well-Known Member
Yes, I wondered if we're witnessing a "Taylor Trajectory" start to the season, good reason to be optimistic that this isn't the case. Ranieri isn't out of his depth as Taylor was, his legacy from NP looks wholly beneficial at the moment - the complete lack of Junior Lewis-type henchmen (Carl Cort for e.g.) coming in has been a very pleasant surprise for me. Unless NP turns up as manager at Sunderland before Xmas, the "King Across the Water" scenario and disgruntled senior pros which destabilised Taylor and the team so disastrously - also absent.
Best of all, after two rounds of matches, virtually every PL team looks vulnerable to the "simple" tactic of attacking in numbers and at pace, with wingers running directly at (or past) defenders - and we seem to be the best exponents of that, at the moment.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 19 | 46 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 20 | 40 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 20 | 40 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 20 | 36 |
| 5 | Newcastle | 20 | 35 |
| 6 | Manchester C | 20 | 34 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 20 | 33 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 20 | 32 |
| 9 | Fulham | 20 | 30 |
| 10 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
| 11 | Brentford | 20 | 27 |
| 12 | Tottenham | 20 | 24 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
| 14 | West Ham | 20 | 23 |
| 15 | Palace | 20 | 21 |
| 16 | Everton | 19 | 17 |
| 17 | Wolves | 20 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 20 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |
