Stockport (away)

[Scarby]

Lets make it 3 out 3.

 

[Melton Fox]

----------------------------Martin--------------------------

------Gilbert--------------Morrison--------------Tunchev----

Gradel----------Weso------Oakley--------King-----------Dyer

----------------------Dickov-------Fryatt-------------------

 

[bocadillo]

----------------------------Martin--------------------------

------Gilbert--------------Morrison--------------Tunchev----

Gradel----------Weso------Oakley--------King-----------Dyer

----------------------Dickov-------Fryatt-------------------

I fancy that Henderson and Howard will get the shout over Martin and Dickov, but otherwise I would have no problem with that.

 

[Melton Fox]

I fancy that Henderson and Howard will get the shout over Martin and Dickov, but otherwise I would have no problem with that.

Agree 100%.

I never know whether to post what I think will be the line up, or what I would like. This one is what I would like to see, but I agree with your comment.

 

[bocadillo]

Agree 100%.

I never know whether to post what I think will be the line up, or what I would like. This one is what I would like to see, but I agree with your comment.

I would pick Henderson. And I don't think Dickov is ready for 90 minutes/starting a game yet.

 

[Tamworth Fox]

Henderson

Hobbs
Morrison
Tunchev
Gilbert

Gradel
King
Oakley
Dyer

Dickov
Fryatt

Subs:
Martin, Worley, Adams, Levi & Howard

Prediction: 1-1

 

[newtonfox]

Agree with what melts and boc have said

3-1 city

 

[londonfox]

Surely it's got to be the same team that played against MK - with the obvious exception of Mattock not playing. What did anyone do last Saturday to deserve being dropped? Changing the whole shape of the side just because one player is out is ridiculous in my opinion, as is having Gradel as a wing back.

Henderson

Gilbert Morrison Tunchev O'Neill

Gradel King Oakley Dyer

Howard Fryatt


Martin, Hobbs, Dickov, Adams, Kishishev

 

[Melton Fox]

Changing the whole shape of the side just because one player is out is ridiculous in my opinion, as is having Gradel as a wing back

Indeed. Anybody who would suggest Gradel playing as wing back would be a fool.

 

[David Gwilliam]

I would guess that David Martin has come here expecting to be first choice keeper. A 22 year old England Under 20 keeper would not have been loaned to us to keep the bench warm. Of course he could mess up like Ben Alnwick did; but deserves the chance. Some people have put Gilbert or Tunchev at left back. Does Tunchev have any experience there? Of course Gilbert has not yet got much experience in his own position let alone left nack; though I think he is talented. I would rather we tried to get a specialist left back on loan. I would start with Dickov and Fryatt up front and then replace Dickov when his stamina runs out. Who I replaced Dickov with would depend on the score at the time? However, I think the manager will start with Howard and Fryatt.

 

[londonfox]

David Martin deserves the chance

Why?

 

[bocadillo]

David Martin deserves the chance.

Based on what I have seen in the first two games, he doesn't.

 

[Lako42]

Same as MK apert from Mattock. The accademy left back will have to do im affraid. Lets hope we can get away with it.

Changing a winning team, i dont know.

 

[Melton Fox]

Changing a winning team, i dont know.

If they won convincingly and never looked like conceding, then I'd agree.

I think we won by default TBH.

But maybe that is the standard for this league.

 

[dpjfox]

Kis right back Gilbert left (as were too late now to get a replacement) still going for a win 1-2 Fryatt and Dickov

 

[Foxblogger]

----------------------------Martin--------------------------

------Gilbert--------------Morrison--------------Tunchev----

Gradel----------Weso------Oakley--------King-----------Dyer

----------------------Dickov-------Fryatt-------------------

I'm intrigued, are you predicting a 3-5-2, a system we haven't played in years, or is this just what you'd like to see?

Either way, Gradel would be wasted as a wing-back despite his strength in the tackle.

 

[Melton Fox]

I'm intrigued, are you predicting a 3-5-2, a system we haven't played in years, or is this just what you'd like to see?

Either way, Gradel would be wasted as a wing-back despite his strength in the tackle.

It's what I'd like to see, as I've already said.

Anybody who would have Gradel as a wing back is a fool, as I've already said.

 

[Foxblogger]

It's what I'd like to see, as I've already said.

Anybody who would have Gradel as a wing back is a fool, as I've already said.

So why put him in your team at wing-back? There's an inherent contradiction here.

 

[Melton Fox]

So why put him in your team at wing-back? There's an inherent contradiction here.

He's at Right Wing, where I would always put him.

I think you are possibly confusing where I have put him, with the apparent vacant Right Back position. When I say apparent, I mean the bit where I have put Gilbert.

 

[highland fox]

Be the same team as Saturday with someone replacing Mattock,hopefully a new signing if not Adams IMO