Lako42
Well-Known Member
You are not seeing the point I'm making though.
thats all i am going to be saying on this matter.
You are not seeing the point I'm making though.
Think about it guys, it takes an average 8-10 weeks to move house. We are talking about legal and financial mine fields to go through. No offence to anyone who works in the industries but legal and financial people are renowned for dragging their feet when it comes to getting anything sorted, it is how they make their money!
I don't think the subject itself is boring - only when people just repeat the same comments.
The issue of the time taken to move house is not relevant. To start off with if there is sufficient imperative and professionals spending the time - a house purchase can be conducted very quickly indeed.
I think the primary problem here is likely to be more about putting together a deal that will satisfy 90% of shareholders and the secondary problem that I suspect that there is not entirely commonality of purpose amongst all the parties.
Whilst the board - may be agreed to sell in principlehowever, they do have a responsibility to recommend that on terms that are defensible to other shareholders....and acknowledging that the club is more or less financially a liability as things stands, has a board and management that is not fit for purpose and should be handed over to MM for next to nowt may be difficult for them to handle. Then there are those who have played a weasal game throughout the whole process - and I will not engage in repetition by going there today. The fun will start there if and when the deal aborts - as I have always feared and expected.
I seen it Alex :icon_lol:
I seen it Alex :icon_lol:
:icon_bigg
very good alex!
well done alex lots of new info there :icon_lol:
I don't think the subject itself is boring - only when people just repeat the same comments.
The issue of the time taken to move house is not relevant. To start off with if there is sufficient imperative and professionals spending the time - a house purchase can be conducted very quickly indeed.
I think the primary problem here is likely to be more about putting together a deal that will satisfy 90% of shareholders and the secondary problem that I suspect that there is not entirely commonality of purpose amongst all the parties.
Whilst the board - may be agreed to sell in principlehowever, they do have a responsibility to recommend that on terms that are defensible to other shareholders....and acknowledging that the club is more or less financially a liability as things stands, has a board and management that is not fit for purpose and should be handed over to MM for next to nowt may be difficult for them to handle. Then there are those who have played a weasal game throughout the whole process - and I will not engage in repetition by going there today. The fun will start there if and when the deal aborts - as I have always feared and expected.
I fear you are forgetting a rather important third party whose say so was required - the Teachers' Pension Fund of New York. I would guess a lot of the delay is down to them agreeing to MM taking over the hire purchase of the Stadium.
Interesting.
I notice that you say "was" required. Does that indicate that you also think that the proposed deal is going out of the window?
No, I was using the past tense as it appears MM has resolved matters with the pension fund. I am taking his mother's illness at face value - it would certainly be some conspiracy to involve LCFC, MM, MM's mother and both sets of advisors for it to be anything else than an unfortunate occurence.
I know if my mum caught me trying to spend £25million she would probably cop it..
What would the board gain by making this up? They would eventually have to tell us the truth that he'd walked so why buy a few more days?
I don't think it's like that.
My guess is that it's not about MM having categorically stated at this moment that he has pulled out. The reality looks like MM has been sounding increasingly downbeat for some days now and appears to be fed up by the whole wretched process.
I sense that this takeover is most unlikely to happen now. The reasons for the failure will be held to be complex - no side specifically to blame etc etc. But I would think that most supporters will feel that the club is so pathetically run that there is little it couldn't mess up.
I think you have to seize the moment in these situations and the club failed to do that....and there was a lot of initial downmouthing from a group that purports to represents fans interests. None of this indicated the right sort of enthusiasm to match MM's initial interest.
I don't think it's like that.
My guess is that it's not about MM having categorically stated at this moment that he has pulled out. The reality looks like MM has been sounding increasingly downbeat for some days now and appears to be fed up by the whole wretched process.
I sense that this takeover is most unlikely to happen now. The reasons for the failure will be held to be complex - no side specifically to blame etc etc. But I would think that most supporters will feel that the club is so pathetically run that there is little it couldn't mess up.
I think you have to seize the moment in these situations and the club failed to do that....and there was a lot of initial downmouthing from a group that purports to represents fans interests. None of this indicated the right sort of enthusiasm to match MM's initial interest.
There are a lot of assumptions being made here.
MM has an exclusivity agreement with the Board, so they cannot look at other options unless the deal has collapsed or he gives them permission (if there are any other options).
It could just as easily be a delay by MM as he tries to get his money from Gaydemark (sp?).
We will just have to let the dust settle and see what happens.
Personally I do not think that MM would use his mother being seriously ill as an excuse for this delay unless it was true.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |