Takeover Latest !

[alex]

I've fecked off knowing those two are on the prowl....:icon_conf

Which two?

 

[Boy Genius]

Which two?

HF and Pinkyboy

 

[alex]

HF and Pinkyboy

You mean you know about Pinkyboy?

 

[Boy Genius]

You mean you know about Pinkyboy?

very warey

 

[alex]

very warey

Rightly so......

 

[Redditch Fox]

Redditch, you have constantly accused the FT of being against this from the start based on their apparant negative attitude towards the deal, yet as far back as I can remember you have beein saying you "don't see it happening", "it's going out of the window", "in the unlikely event of it happening", so how exactly are you any different to the FT?

As follows: I don't think the FT has ever wanted it - but had to tone down it's negativity after the Board gave support in principle and the FT found itself being bad moutherd.

I think that the deal would be about the only chance of turning the club back into something competitive and am therefore very keen that it should happen......but I don't think that it will for the reasons I have expressed.

Unfortunately, my negative attitudes usually prove justified in all things relating to LCFC- I very much hope to be wrong on this one and will be more than glad to admit I got it wrong.

 

[Boy Genius]

As follows: I don't think the FT has ever wanted it - but had to tone down it's negativity after the Board gave support in principle and the FT found itself being bad moutherd.

I think that the deal would be about the only chance of turning the club back into something competitive and am therefore very keen that it should happen......but I don't think that it will for the reasons I have expressed.

Unfortunately, my negative attitudes usually prove justified in all things relating to LCFC- I very much hope to be wrong on this one and will be more than glad to admit I got it wrong.

I hope so too RF....

 

[alex]

I hope so three RF.....

 

[Boy Genius]

I hope so three RF.....

never been in a three some like this before....:icon_conf

 

[western road]

As with all things Leicester City things never ever run smoothly.

 

[newtonfox]

As with all things Leicester City things never ever run smoothly.

as always :icon_wink

 

[Foxes_Trust]

..and there was a lot of initial downmouthing from a group that purports to represents fans interests. None of this indicated the right sort of enthusiasm to match MM's initial interest.

Any initial perceived Trust "negativity" was because all anybody had read prior to that was Bill Anderson's side of the story, as in his MM PR campaign. We just raised a series of questions about what was actually contained in the bid.

We know BA believes the existing shareholders should have given the club to MM for nought, is that really a fair deal for 48 LCFC fans (well the vast majority of shareholders are real fans) just to enable MM to make a potential vast profit for himself in the future?

The LCFC board's motivies are based on obtaining the best long term future for the club & the best deal they can for the shareholders who appointed them.

The Trust's motive is to ensure the best long term future for the club

So what exactly is driving Bill Anderson's agenda ?
- that is a question few fans seem to be asking

 

[alex]

Any initial perceived Trust "negativity" was because all anybody had read prior to that was Bill Anderson's side of the story, as in his MM PR campaign. We just raised a series of questions about what was actually contained in the bid.

We know BA believes the existing shareholders should have given the club to MM for nought, is that really a fair deal for 48 LCFC fans (well the vast majority of shareholders are real fans) just to enable MM to make a potential vast profit for himself in the future?

The LCFC board's motivies are based on obtaining the best long term future for the club & the best deal they can for the shareholders who appointed them.

The Trust's motive is to ensure the best long term future for the club

So what exactly is driving Bill Anderson's agenda ?
- that is a question few fans seem to be asking

Simple, reporting. He's a hack!

 

[Durham Fox]

Any initial perceived Trust "negativity" was because all anybody had read prior to that was Bill Anderson's side of the story, as in his MM PR campaign. We just raised a series of questions about what was actually contained in the bid.

We know BA believes the existing shareholders should have given the club to MM for nought, is that really a fair deal for 48 LCFC fans (well the vast majority of shareholders are real fans) just to enable MM to make a potential vast profit for himself in the future?

The LCFC board's motivies are based on obtaining the best long term future for the club & the best deal they can for the shareholders who appointed them.

The Trust's motive is to ensure the best long term future for the club

So what exactly is driving Bill Anderson's agenda ?
- that is a question few fans seem to be asking

Do you not think the £xM MM is paying for these shares could be put to better use then?

 

[Foxes_Trust]

Simple, reporting. He's a hack!

Isn't reporting supposed to show a balance though, BA's coverage has been completely pro MM & critical of the board/shareholders on every occasion

 

[Babylon]

Do you not think the £xM MM is paying for these shares could be put to better use then?

Of course they could.... but that isn't the point.

 

[Foxes_Trust]

Do you not think the £xM MM is paying for these shares could be put to better use then?

If you personally put in say £100k, would you be happy to receive nothing back, so MM can walk away with profits in x years time?

We believe the majority of shareholders are willing to hand over the club now, allow money invested now & in the immediate future to be utilised funding the squad/club & then receive payment for their shares at a much later date.

 

[OldGit]

Do you not think the £xM MM is paying for these shares could be put to better use then?

I want your car. Give it to me for nothing, as the £x thousand you want for it could be put to better use. :icon_bigg

 

[Nottingham Fox]

FT .. simple question ...

When do you expect MM to return to conclude the deal ? Any indications how long he'l be away for?

 

[Lako42]

Isn't reporting supposed to show a balance though, BA's coverage has been completely pro MM & critical of the board/shareholders on every occasion

BA is a cnut Fact.




thats all i know, nothing more nothing less