Matt_B
Well-Known Member
I agree: but, have they?
No idea, ask Bert
I agree: but, have they?
No idea, ask Bert
So then, I've not heard this one for such a long while...
According to @indykaila, Mr. E. I. Heskey is on his way home. In season 14/15 according sources close to the player.
I love a good story.
So then, I've not heard this one for such a long while...
According to @indykaila, Mr. E. I. Heskey is on his way home. In season 14/15 according sources close to the player.
I love a good story.
Seems like St Ledger has been told he can leave ...
http://www.joe.ie/football/football...g-to-put-himself-in-the-shop-window-0038310-1
All of the players on the big contracts are available if anyone will take them, SSL is on close to double the pay of Morgan, incidentally Morgan is being linked with a £3m bid from Cardiff which would probably see him going because he is in the last year of his contract.
Cutting the wage bill has to be good and I would not describe SSL as irreplaceable but, taking transfer fees into account, it will not be easy to replace his experience for a lot less money.
I honestly do not understand what is going on at Leicester. We are big spending, cost cutting; we have a manager who MUST get promotion in one season, is building a young squad for the future. Our owners seem committed to Leicester but the grand plan seems to change on a daily basis.
Cutting the wage bill has to be good and I would not describe SSL as irreplaceable but, taking transfer fees into account, it will not be easy to replace his experience for a lot less money.
.
Apart from from Chris Wood.
It is obvious that the club is now in full cost reduction mode, they will try to offload all of the most expensive players, sell anyone that we get a decent offer for and stick with the current manager because it would cost £3m to sack him. I don't think this has changed recently (last 6 months) and it is the reason we didn't strengthen the squad in January.
it's not obvious at the moment; we won't know for a few weeks whether that is the case. offloading ssl, beckford and danns isn't a sign that we're cutting costs full-stop, we have been trying to get rid of them for almost a year, because pearson feels we can't use them and they don't offer value for money.
letting schmeichel or morgan go without meaningfully replacing them would clearly mean we've changed direction/objectives. the owners reigned in the spending even last year, hence why we operated with a small squad, eg no reserve left back, only 4 recognised centre-midfielders, etc. they allowed Pearson to invest significantly, but they didn't give him the blank cheque Sven enjoyed. i'd be happy for the same level of investment this year, and if we can get 2 of danns, beckford and ssl off the wage bill we will probably get that imo
The fact is, the club has GOT to be on a cost cuttting mission, it cannot continue spending like it has. The reported £30m loss last year has to be no more that £3m this next season. We have to get our finances within the new parameters or face a transfer embargo. There will be a few clubs with a lot more money to spend than us next year and I think we may well struggle to compete at the top end of the table, especially if we start to offload the better players.
I'm relaying what I was told by an 'in the know' at the cricket on Sunday, that's where I got the £3m to sack Nigel figure from
not doubting what you were told, but i can't believe the owners, having had to sack two managers within about a year, would allow a situation to arise whereby it would cost them £3m to sack Pearson
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |