Anyone who thinks we will buy players to improve the squad without selling a major asset is either deluded or hasn't been paying attention.
If we had to sell one of our big assets then Chilwell it is imo.
Hmm I'm not sure, a lot of opposition managers target him, look at Liverpool on Boxing day, Chilwell can't defend and he leaves huge gaps that get exploited.I do love how much wee underrate Chilwell. He can't be that bad can he?
We've got £80m in the bank from the last one we sold.
Hmm I'm not sure, a lot of opposition managers target him, look at Liverpool on Boxing day, Chilwell can't defend and he leaves huge gaps that get exploited.
His strengths are his stamina and his ability going forward but he's not consistent enough with his final ball to be yet classed as a top player, he's the best of an average bunch as far as England is concerned
I think it's a case of not knowing what you've got til it's gone with Chilwell.
If it was that easy to replace him then he wouldn't be in such demand.
He's English
If he was Portuguese nobody would be interested.
The only reason Chilwell is in demand is because he's young and currently occupying a position that doesn't have lots of world class players playing there.I think it's a case of not knowing what you've got til it's gone with Chilwell.
If it was that easy to replace him then he wouldn't be in such demand.
I rate him. But we need to strengthen other areas, and he’d be the one who would bring in the most money because of his age and nationality.I do love how much wee underrate Chilwell. He can't be that bad can he?
The only reason Chilwell is in demand is because he's young and currently occupying a position that doesn't have lots of world class players playing there.
If we sold Chilwell for £60 million and brought Jamal Lewis from Norwich for £20 million then spent £18 million loaning Coutinho for the season that would make us a better team.
Are you taking the piss?I do love how much wee underrate Chilwell. He can't be that bad can he?
I'm not being awkward or anything, this is a genuine question - After the shitfest of an end to the season, using this formation, compared to the success we had for the first half of the season, using the system we did, why would you like us to use this formation? It doesn't make any sense to me.Chilwell would look good playing wingback with a strong back three: the formation that I hope we use next season.
Why would we agree to strengthen a side we competed with all season long?
Slimani, Silva, Ghezzal and Diabate.Who would people rather sell to enable us to strengthen multiple positions?
AND MATTY JAMESSlimani, Silva, Ghezzal and Diabate.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Arsenal | 21 | 43 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 21 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Aston Villa | 21 | 35 |
8 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
9 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
10 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
11 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
12 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
13 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
14 | Palace | 21 | 24 |
15 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
18 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 21 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |