Who was it we omitted due to injury a couple of years ago only for him to get fit and we couldn't use him in the run in?
Justin.
Who was it we omitted due to injury a couple of years ago only for him to get fit and we couldn't use him in the run in?
Didn't Papy Mendy fall into a similar category? Not through injury but surplus to requirements, until he wasn't.Who was it we omitted due to injury a couple of years ago only for him to get fit and we couldn't use him in the run in?
Yes.Didn't Papy Mendy fall into a similar category? Not through injury but surplus to requirements, until he wasn't.
Yes. That Maresca didn't have any interest in a striker with pace & physicality with the style of play he wanted from us. He looked fine to me in the rare run outs he had.Doesn’t this tell you something?
Why did he play Vardy then?Yes. That Maresca didn't have any interest in a striker with pace & physicality with the style of play he wanted from us.
The club will assess the end of the season situation at the end of the season. I think we're being more-or-less forced into that short-term, but I'd say pragmatic, thinking.
Tbf, it must be a nightmare situation to try and plan in. The club have to plan and position financially in the event of relegation all whilst supporting the manager in their attempts to keep the club up. Given the revenue differences, that's not an easy task. One to stay positive yet but be aware of the possibility.
Because Vardy was obviously first choice. He didn't want two versions of the same style of striker (or 3 if you believe that Daka is also quite similar).Why did he play Vardy then?
Because Vardy was obviously first choice. He didn't want two versions of the same style of striker (or 3 if you believe that Daka is also quite similar).
With Vardy now unlikely to be here next season why not give a chance to a 22 year old who plays in a similar way? Giving young players with a point to prove, hungry to make an impression used to be our thing. We need to get back to it, especially as we no longer have the money to spunk on Slimanis, Musas etc.
Getting back to that pattern is the best chance we have of preventing the club spiralling into oblivion.
No. King was a midfielderVardy is King
King wasn't Speedy though.No. King was a midfielder
Speedy
Iz-zit?? How do you know I wasn't referring to the adjective?It's Speedie.
I thought I said he wasn't? You didn't Reid it Wright.King was Speedie? I never knew that. That's some reinvention. This forum is a mine of information.
I thought you said he wasn't Speedy. I was in complete agreement there but that he was Speedie was a total revelation to me.I thought I said he wasn't?
I'm just confused with the whole Vardy isn't King, who's not Speedie? Is-it just me who's not Wright?I thought you said he wasn't Speedy. I was in complete agreement there but that he was Speedie was a total revelation to me.
Nah, they're all Kuntz.Everyone here is Wright. Or so they would have you believe.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
3 | Arsenal | 20 | 40 |
4 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
5 | Newcastle | 20 | 35 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
8 | Aston Villa | 20 | 32 |
9 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
10 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
11 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
12 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
13 | Tottenham | 20 | 24 |
14 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
15 | Palace | 20 | 21 |
16 | Everton | 19 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 20 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 20 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |