I think it'd be a flat rate to the promoter. Everything else would be subbed out so i don't think it would make a difference.lazzer said:wouldnt sell out gigs help finance a better team ?
MKFox said:I think it'd be a flat rate to the promoter. Everything else would be subbed out so i don't think it would make a difference.lazzer said:wouldnt sell out gigs help finance a better team ?
MKFox said:Didn't know that Steven, thanks.
What a joke
Foxes Trust said:As an option, the club can choose to charge a fixed fee to a promoter for its revenue & leave the risk & PR to promoter. Maybe this would be the better option until the venue is an established concert venue, before the club tries to promote a concert itself again
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 19 | 46 |
2 | Arsenal | 20 | 40 |
3 | Nottm F | 20 | 40 |
4 | Chelsea | 20 | 36 |
5 | Newcastle | 20 | 35 |
6 | Manchester C | 20 | 34 |
7 | Bournemouth | 20 | 33 |
8 | Aston Villa | 20 | 32 |
9 | Fulham | 20 | 30 |
10 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
11 | Brentford | 20 | 27 |
12 | Tottenham | 20 | 24 |
13 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
14 | West Ham | 20 | 23 |
15 | Palace | 20 | 21 |
16 | Everton | 19 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 20 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 20 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |