I think it'd be a flat rate to the promoter. Everything else would be subbed out so i don't think it would make a difference.lazzer said:wouldnt sell out gigs help finance a better team ?
MKFox said:I think it'd be a flat rate to the promoter. Everything else would be subbed out so i don't think it would make a difference.lazzer said:wouldnt sell out gigs help finance a better team ?
MKFox said:Didn't know that Steven, thanks.
What a joke
Foxes Trust said:As an option, the club can choose to charge a fixed fee to a promoter for its revenue & leave the risk & PR to promoter. Maybe this would be the better option until the venue is an established concert venue, before the club tries to promote a concert itself again
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Manchester C | 4 | 12 |
2 | Arsenal | 4 | 10 |
3 | Newcastle | 4 | 10 |
4 | Liverpool | 4 | 9 |
5 | Aston Villa | 4 | 9 |
6 | Brighton | 4 | 8 |
7 | Nottm F | 4 | 8 |
8 | Chelsea | 4 | 7 |
9 | Brentford | 4 | 6 |
10 | Manchester U | 4 | 6 |
11 | Bournemouth | 4 | 5 |
12 | Fulham | 4 | 5 |
13 | Tottenham | 4 | 4 |
14 | West Ham | 4 | 4 |
15 | Leicester | 4 | 2 |
16 | Palace | 4 | 2 |
17 | Ipswich | 4 | 2 |
18 | Wolves | 4 | 1 |
19 | Southampton | 4 | 0 |
20 | Everton | 4 | 0 |