They're talking about us

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Miles Away said:
Where did I say that then?
Click to expand...

Maybe you didn't. Maybe I inferred it wrongly from your statement about £22m being a good return on £3m.

If you don't want to sell him for £22m (peanuts) I apologise for my misunderstanding and agree with you 100%
 
FIF said:
Maybe you didn't. Maybe I inferred it wrongly from your statement about £22m being a good return on £3m.

If you don't want to sell him for £22m (peanuts) I apologise for my misunderstanding and agree with you 100%
Click to expand...

I'm a big big Demarai Gray fan, as you know. But I just don't understand how you can class £22m as "peanuts"?
 
Miles Away said:
Nothing really in that article though. Speculative. Riyad will go, Gray likely won't...though 22m would be a nice return on 3m
Click to expand...

Well frankly the Mahrez sentence is just something anything could have written and is probably only in there to add Mahrez to the headline.
 
glyn said:
Well frankly the Mahrez sentence is just something anything could have written and is probably only in there to add Mahrez to the headline.
Click to expand...

I'm not even sure why it's there other than they have a word count to reach or something. A headline may explain it though.
 
I'm sorry to dig up the past but I can't help but go back to these youtube videos when I've had the odd drink. For this to have happened to my club is just the most unbelievable thing that will ever happen. Vardy and Mahrez were just brilliant last year, as was everyone else. I think that this is only now really sinking in. That Chelsea game was just brilliant. Mahrez goal was pure poetry and I think Vardy's was my favourite that year. Mahrez's brilliant clip into his path and Vardy between two defenders volleying home. Just sublime. I know its been done to death, but it will never get old to me.

 
Speedy1 said:
I'm sorry to dig up the past but I can't help but go back to these youtube videos when I've had the odd drink. For this to have happened to my club is just the most unbelievable thing that will ever happen. Vardy and Mahrez were just brilliant last year, as was everyone else. I think that this is only now really sinking in. That Chelsea game was just brilliant. Mahrez goal was pure poetry and I think Vardy's was my favourite that year. Mahrez's brilliant clip into his path and Vardy between two defenders volleying home. Just sublime. I know its been done to death, but it will never get old to me.

Click to expand...


I still have real difficulty watching this without wiping away a tear.
 
FIF said:
We'll just disagree then.

Gray is going to be a fantastic player and he's already something very special. He's better now than Mahrez was before last season. IMO of course.
Click to expand...

I don't understand all the fuss. When has Gray made you think he's better than Mahrez?!
 
I find this hard to believe but apparently we have the third best league record at White Hart Lane ahead of its last game today

Most points per league game
Man U 1.30
Chelsea 1.29
LCFC 1.21
Arsenal 1.19
 
glyn said:
I find this hard to believe but apparently we have the third best league record at White Hart Lane ahead of its last game today

Most points per league game
Man U 1.30
Chelsea 1.29
LCFC 1.21
Arsenal 1.19
Click to expand...
Is this one of those rubbish football starting in the nineties kind of stats?

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
 
jb5000 said:
Is this one of those rubbish football starting in the nineties kind of stats?

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It didn't say in the paper, and it was in an article about the history of white hart lane so you'd have expected it to be about pre-92 as well. But I suspect you are right.
 
Now, I know that I'm in a really bad mood and that you lot already think that I'm a complete loon with my conspiracy theories, but . . .

This here article got me thinking: http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...etting-chelsea-sign-ngolo-kante-a3543251.html

How come he went to Chelsea? The release clause was supposedly for a Champions League club. Now our owners are extremely friendly down Chelsea way. They have a box there and sponsor them in various ways. Anyone would think that they were trying to ingratiate themselves towards the powers that be at Chelsea in case they ever get a chance to take over there. Maybe. Possibly.

So anyway, Kante sold on the cheap to Chelsea who weren't part of his clause. What exactly was that all about?
 
Brown Nose said:
Now, I know that I'm in a really bad mood and that you lot already think that I'm a complete loon with my conspiracy theories, but . . .

This here article got me thinking: http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...etting-chelsea-sign-ngolo-kante-a3543251.html

How come he went to Chelsea? The release clause was supposedly for a Champions League club. Now our owners are extremely friendly down Chelsea way. They have a box there and sponsor them in various ways. Anyone would think that they were trying to ingratiate themselves towards the powers that be at Chelsea in case they ever get a chance to take over there. Maybe. Possibly.

So anyway, Kante sold on the cheap to Chelsea who weren't part of his clause. What exactly was that all about?
Click to expand...

I think Top is negotiating a swap of Leicester and Leuven for Chelsea.
 
Brown Nose said:
Now, I know that I'm in a really bad mood and that you lot already think that I'm a complete loon with my conspiracy theories, but . . .

This here article got me thinking: http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...etting-chelsea-sign-ngolo-kante-a3543251.html

How come he went to Chelsea? The release clause was supposedly for a Champions League club. Now our owners are extremely friendly down Chelsea way. They have a box there and sponsor them in various ways. Anyone would think that they were trying to ingratiate themselves towards the powers that be at Chelsea in case they ever get a chance to take over there. Maybe. Possibly.

So anyway, Kante sold on the cheap to Chelsea who weren't part of his clause. What exactly was that all about?
Click to expand...
So Abramovich will sell Chelsea to Srivaddhanaprabha in gratitude for getting Kanté on a cheap? Yes, that makes a lot of sense.
 
Blaarev said:
So Abramovich will sell Chelsea to Srivaddhanaprabha in gratitude for getting Kanté on a cheap? Yes, that makes a lot of sense.
Click to expand...

Perhaps Kanté is just the first step (in BN's view), perhaps Mahrez gets his wish to go there this season and Morgan replaces John Terry.
 
FIF said:
Perhaps Kanté is just the first step (in BN's view), perhaps Mahrez gets his wish to go there this season and Morgan replaces John Terry.
Click to expand...
The creator has a masterplan.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top