Matt_B
Well-Known Member
I agree, just thought I'd highlight about their attitude toward the kids (between 9 and 15 years old in this case)I think it would be different if at 16/17 they are told they are not good enough (but even then i would hope they are given some guidance and support in pursuing another career) but after beeing given a proffesional contract, can any youth be expected to edge his bets?
I don't think any club should be responsible for the rest of a players life, but Tom and others like him are given contracts, surely it will be seen as a statement that they are, or at least expected to be that 1 in 20.
I don't believe it would be right to let them rot until their contract expires without even trying to give them a chance elsewhere.
Last edited: