Willlow
Well-Known Member
He has put all of the possible outcomes from this season in order of his personal preference
What part of it don't you understand ?
How somebody can put their hatred of Holloway over City staying up :icon_roll
He has put all of the possible outcomes from this season in order of his personal preference
What part of it don't you understand ?
Is that what you think?How somebody can put their hatred of Holloway over City staying up :icon_roll
How somebody can put their hatred of Holloway over City staying up :icon_roll
Is that what you think?
I don't hate Holloway, and I AM putting my club first (IMO), but feel free to reach out for any other conclusion you like.
In the same way others put their devotion to him over the facts
Yes, we are already in the Championship with him, and we're almost relegated.So you're suggesting City would be better off in League One without Holloway, then in the Championship with him. No matter who is in charge League One is not better for the club :icon_roll
Have you seen anybody suggest we would be better off with Holloway in League One, then without him in the Championship
So you're suggesting City would be better off in League One without Holloway, then in the Championship with him. No matter who is in charge League One is not better for the club :icon_roll
I've seen people rattle on and on and on and on about stability and that is there only and sole reason they can dish out for us having this utter Turd in charge of our Club.The man is absolutely hopeless.I don't care about the ifs but maybes and what have yous I want the tosser out of my club,he can take his Jim Davidson book of Wit And Humour and feck off as far away from LCFC has possible.I'm sick to death of hearing these bullshit excuses of Stability and who would do better,right now anybody would be better becauise Ian Holloway has proved conclusively that he is totally and utterly out of his depth
Can't find anything to disagree with there. I think his supposed 'humour' actually makes me dislike him more. If he's still in charge come the new season I might not go.
Yes - the thing about Holloway is that he is so clearly a phoney.
He pitches his humour to appeal to the infantile and stupid. I am quite sure that he is not stupid as the people he seeks to appeal to - in fact he has developed a very good line in in self preservation by making himself popular with mainly thickos. This is not to claim that everyone who likes Holloway is thick - but it is to such people that he is directing his personality.
Quite simply - Leicester City Football Club deserves better than Holloway - i can quite see why Mandaric is having difficulty in getting rid of him - but he really does have to go if we are to move forward.
Think I agree with most of that apart from the bold bit - if the club deserved better the club would have better.
...
I sense a discrepancy in your calculation.
Quite simply - Leicester City Football Club deserves better than Holloway - i can quite see why Mandaric is having difficulty in getting rid of him.
Have I missed something, RF.........?
Because of this bogus popularity - Mandaric may well have found it difficult to exercise his normal policies of getting shut when it doesnt work out.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 22 | 53 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 23 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 23 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 23 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 23 | 37 |
9 | Brighton | 23 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 23 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 22 | 23 |
17 | Leicester | 23 | 17 |
18 | Wolves | 23 | 16 |
19 | Ipswich | 23 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 23 | 6 |