The skill we need right now is being able to score goals and Harvey’s showing that. I’m not saying he’s definitely the answer - but there is plenty of evidence to suggest he may be a better choice than our immediate backup?yeah and how long has it taken him to reach that level in his position? so lets, having lost Vardy for a couple of weeks take our next biggest weapon out of his position ...
Not every winger can play centrally and Henry was one of the best players of his era
So we take the best defensive midfielder in the league, one that our whole game is based on, ie breaking up the oppositions attack to create a counter attack and stick him up front out the way.I seem to remember that in 2015 when Vardy was out for two weeks, everyone said the wheels would come off and the sky would fall in, but other players just stood up to the plate and we carried on scoring goals and winning matches.
Barnes could do Vardy's job if we had the equivalent of Okazaki as a defence disruptor.
If we could trust Mendy and/or Choudhury to protect our defence we could use Ndidi in the Okazaki role to cause mayhem up front and create the spaces for Barnes, Maddison, Albrighton, Castagne and Perez to use.
I was just about to say that it was noticeable that Praet was often the midfielder going beyond Perez in the Stoke game, which presumably means that Maddison would be expected to do similar.Will be interesting to see how Perez would do up front supported by Barnes and Madderz. He's a totally different player to Vardy but would be more comfortable than Ian and defending from the front.
Bob on Pop, **** about moving players around fitting square pegs into round holes and we are depleting our effectiveness further.It's really simple. Our team is set really well at present and we need as little disruption as possible. Perez in for Vardy will do. We don't need to start messing around taking Barnes out of a position he is doing so well in unless there is absolutely no other choice.
Most of the time, neither Liverpool nor Man City play with a central striker.
Maybe BR wants to play an extra attacking midfielder (hence the transfer links) in the absence of Vardy rather than attempt to replace him.
That's working a treat for Liverpool at the moment isn't it!
It's a shame we don't have anyone like Ulloa in the squad. In hindsight he was overshadowed a bit by Vardy but proved to be a very usefrul player.
I'd rather go into this with prime Ulloa than Perez or Ihanacho for the next few weeks. Am I looking at the past with blue tinted glasses on there?
I think Perez given a few games will do ok, he did well at Newcastle when playing the number 9 roll including scoring a good goal against us.
We have survived without Vardy before and done well, we will also have to start getting use to not having Vardy sooner rather than later.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 17 | 42 |
2 | Arsenal | 18 | 36 |
3 | Chelsea | 18 | 35 |
4 | Nottm F | 18 | 34 |
5 | Newcastle | 18 | 29 |
6 | Bournemouth | 18 | 29 |
7 | Manchester C | 18 | 28 |
8 | Fulham | 18 | 28 |
9 | Aston Villa | 18 | 28 |
10 | Brighton | 18 | 26 |
11 | Brentford | 18 | 24 |
12 | Tottenham | 18 | 23 |
13 | West Ham | 18 | 23 |
14 | Manchester U | 18 | 22 |
15 | Everton | 17 | 17 |
16 | Palace | 18 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 18 | 15 |
18 | Leicester | 18 | 14 |
19 | Ipswich | 18 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 18 | 6 |