Post Match West Ham 1 Leicester 1

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Chilwell is being classed as a left back now just so you can use it as a stick to beat the manager with?

He's no more a left back than I am.

When he's played he's been one of the few players willing to get forward and carry the ball up the pitch himself. He's the 1st choice left sided midfielder imo.
 
I agree. Chilwell looks a very good prospect as a left sided midfielder.
 
If Chilwell wants to be a left back, he needs to know when to hoof the ball, and if necessary the player as well, into row z rather than fannying around with it trying to always play it out of defence.
 
Chilwell is obviously a left back. There is nothing wrong with his defending that games for the first team won't fix. The main issue he has is a lack of first team matches. We should have sent him out on loan earlier than we did.

At some point we need to accept that he's the future and Fuchs is the past and make the change. There will be defensive errors for a while but that's inevitable.

After a full season as our first choice left back, I think he'll be a top player.
 
Chilwell is obviously a left back. There is nothing wrong with his defending that games for the first team won't fix. The main issue he has is a lack of first team matches. We should have sent him out on loan earlier than we did.

At some point we need to accept that he's the future and Fuchs is the past and make the change. There will be defensive errors for a while but that's inevitable.

After a full season as our first choice left back, I think he'll be a top player.

Yes, Chilwell should have a regular place asap - as part of the transition. Fuchs isn't going to improve but Chilwell should.

I'm not sure that the average fan is up for change and the necessary re-modelling and based on the crazy comments of the match thread |I'm certain that lots on this forum aren't.

However, I sense that Puel has been given marching orders to make changes (without getting us relegated) and appears the type to do this. In the meantime expect a bit of pain probably involving getting beat on Tuesday.

Incidentally, my gut feeling is that Puel has been brought in as a transition enforcer and I doubt whether he will be around that long after he has done that stint.
 
So Chilwell is being classed as a left back now just so you can use it as a stick to beat the manager with?

He's no more a left back than I am.

When he's played he's been one of the few players willing to get forward and carry the ball up the pitch himself. He's the 1st choice left sided midfielder imo.
No, I'm suggesting he is a left back because, well, he is a left back. Even in a world where he is a left winger, which of course he isn't, do you think it was a good substitution to make given the circumstances? Just think before you type.

I'm not using any stick to beat any manager. Jump down off that high horse and read my post again. I can see what he is trying and I can see it may take time. I am happy for him to have this as we all should be however, it doesnt mean that his substitutions weren't anything short of ****ing idiotic given the moment. West Ham can't defend for shit and were back peddling time and time again when we were attacking. Okazaki and perhaps even Slimani (who I have little hope in but at least would have offered something different up there) were absolutely made for that second half. Instead, he replaced a number 10, albeit one who was awful most of the game, for a left back playing left wing. It was never going to cause them any issues and it didn't. Jamie Vardy spent the whole of the second half completely isolated with the ball rarely seeing his boots - in fact this was happening from about 35 minutes or so and it was painfully obvious to anyone that it needed changing.
 
Chilwell is obviously a left back. There is nothing wrong with his defending that games for the first team won't fix. The main issue he has is a lack of first team matches. We should have sent him out on loan earlier than we did.

At some point we need to accept that he's the future and Fuchs is the past and make the change. There will be defensive errors for a while but that's inevitable.

After a full season as our first choice left back, I think he'll be a top player.
This. All day long. Perfect.
 
I expect Chilwell, and possibly Amartey winning the full back jobs over time.

No slight on either of current encumbents, but in the case of Fuchs, he’s declining in influence and in the case of Simpson he’s not an attacking full back.
 
Amartey has had some very good games at RB. But he has always looked terrified when put in any attacking position. Maybe it will come but not sure he's ready as an attacking rb yet.
 
Tonights gane: Name the games the last two years Amartey has played right back
 
February 2016 vs Norwich when Simpson was suspended for getting sent off against Arsenal
That is to my knowledge his only game as RB in the League. Most notably remembered for being subbed for Ulloa who went on to make an earthquake. He played two games as RB in the FA Cup last season of which one was against Millwall. This season he has played RB in our League Cup games. He has played much more as CM for us.
 
If we really must have an attacking right back, then from within the current squad I'd vote for using Albrighton.
Like Chilwell, he'll take time to learn the defensive part, but he has good positional sense and the energy to get up and down the touchline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top