I know they are privileged, but having a manager for their ****s is getting ridiculous.They’re probably already taking them having their **** manager constantly throw them under the bus.
I like your team except I'd play Nacho instead of Vardy.Ward
Castagne Evans Faes Justin
Soumare Ndidi
Tielemens
Barnes Maddison
Vardy
It's almost as if nobody has seen Iheanacho play this season..... or ever.Ward
Castagne faes Evans soyuncu justin
tielemans ndidi
Maddison
Ihenacho vardy
He has done more than Vardy has this season.It's almost as if nobody has seen Iheanacho play this season..... or ever.
It's almost as if nobody has seen Iheanacho play this season..... or ever.
He is ****ing useless 90% of the time. If you're going to change it up top then at least use Daka who, although not great so far, shows more capability than Nacho.He has done more than Vardy has this season.
He is criminally under used.
Out of interest, which striker have you seen play this season that is worth his place.It's almost as if nobody has seen Iheanacho play this season..... or ever.
And these numbers in isolation mean pretty much **** all. He's been abhorrent in so many games and I don't care how many shots he has, the ones that hit the corner flag are still useless. If you want to make fair comparisons then these numbers simply aren't very useful.In the PL, Iheanacho is top of our shots per 90 mins, key passes per 90 mins and has one assist (out of a total of four across the five matches). All this in 74 mins on the pitch.
In the three full seasons prior to this one, he's been given 3,664 minutes of PL football - for 21 goals and 10 assists - no penalties of course. That's a goal involvement every 118 minutes.
For comparison, Vardy has a goal involvement over the same three years of every 111 minutes - with all the penalties. Maddison has one every 172 minutes and Barnes every 143 minutes.
I think there is a very strong argument that Iheanacho has been our best attacking player over the last three years.
That's the problem. When Vardy isn't firing, we are toothless as was proven last season. He missed half of our games and was still the top scorer. That tells you everything you need to know about our replacements.Out of interest, which striker have you seen play this season that is worth his place.
And these numbers in isolation mean pretty much **** all. He's been abhorrent in so many games and I don't care how many shots he has, the ones that hit the corner flag are still useless. If you want to make fair comparisons then these numbers simply aren't very useful.
To say that over the last 3 years, Nacho has been better than Vardy is perhaps the single most stupid thing that has been written on this forum. And I'm including Superscout's list.
Oh the irony. The irony burns my eyes. I'm not disputing the numbers, I'm saying that they tell a tiny part of the story.Okay I get it. You don't like other peoples opinions and you don't like facts.
Also wibbleI mean, BN, I often like a lot of what you say
I mean, BN, I often like a lot of what you say but that is exceptional wibble son.
Daka is dreadful. A complete waste of money.He is ****ing useless 90% of the time. If you're going to change it up top then at least use Daka who, although not great so far, shows more capability than Nacho.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |