SJN-Fox
Well-Known Member
I suggest you read your post again.
I know what it says. I wrote it.
I suggest you read your post again.
If you type 'King Power' and 'corruption' into google, you get over 2 million responses.
They’re window lickers for wanting someone you don’t want?
That’s nice.
Please NOT Fat Sam, Coleman, Pardew or Moyes, although I fear its going to be one of these.
So, to sum up, because the company owned by the chairman has been caught up in alleged corruption, it's perfectly okay to accept such behaviour in our prospective manager, a man dogged by corruption allegations, some filmed, some recorded for the best part of 12 years (at least)?If you type 'King Power' and 'corruption' into google, you get over 2 million responses.
Our owners are no strangers to that world. From the moment we sold out to Mad Mandy, our club has been presided over by very dodgy characters. Much like many other clubs.
Anything that Allardyce has been accused of is of no comparison in my opinion. Remember how Pearson stage managed payments to his son or note the fact that the owners appointed Sven who has far more 'corruption baggage' than Allardyce.
By all means disagree with Allardyce on the basis of his managerial ability, but to go for the corruption angle is weak.
Imagine that. This place would explode so what the hell would happen over at FT?Won't be one of those. It'll be Strachan...
They’d all wet the bed.Imagine that. This place would explode so what the hell would happen over at FT?
I love the fact that you've jumped on homer's bandwagon and neither of you have even got the metaphor I used correct. Geniuses.They’d all wet the bed.
How dare they be negative about something.
I guess you'd be over the moon with Strachan then. Mind you, you'd be over the moon with Pearson and that tells its own story.
Won't be one of those. It'll be Strachan...
Imagine that. This place would explode so what the hell would happen over at FT?
....How dare they be negative about something.
I can clarify I definitely wouldn’t be over the moon with Strachan, and I’m not sure where you got that from. You’re good at making assumptions
I concur. See, I don't always disagree with youAncelotti: unrealistic
Allardyce: last final pay day, a managerial dinosaur. No thanks. If we were 18th with 10 games to go, probably.
Dyche: Gerrimin
He engaged in activities which could be considered criminal. I agree it's not 'official' but he has shown himself to be open to corruption time after time. The fact he has yet to be out before the courts doesn't make him any less of a fraud and a charlatan.
I still don’t see where I’ve said I would be over the moon with Strachan. I was just passing comment that people are allowed to be negative at something and not be bed wetting retards.I mean, really? There are so many strings of irony that I can't be bothered to draw you a picture of them.
As long as Dusty Bin is his second and they bring in Billy Shitpants in January I'm happy with Ince. Happier than I would with Allardyce anyway.I still don’t see where I’ve said I would be over the moon with Strachan. I was just passing comment that people are allowed to be negative at something and not be bed wetting retards.
Like I said, you’re good at making assumptions.
Anyway...back to topic...when’s Paul Ince due?
Appleton will win the games he takes charge of, be appointed full time, have a few more successful games after that before the wheels fall off spectacularly and we all go round again...
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |