Williams has signed!

[Steven]

Shall we have a thread on what the fee will be set at?? Everyone can have a guess and the winner gets.......... er **** all??

I would start a new thread or a poll but I aint a clue about how to do that so here goes.

Im going for £400k

Any others??

£250k

 

[marky boy]

mmmm yeah, 3-5 million for a player out of contract... forest can touch my ringer... wankers

 

[webmaster]

I don't think f*rest understand what the tribunal fee is supposed to be for.

It's not supposed to reflect the value of the player.

The tribunal fee is just compensation for the expenses a club has in training a player. So the compensation amount depends more on how long he's been with the club, and the kind of training he's had, rather than how good he is.

 

[lazzer]

ring em and tell em webby :roll:

 

[Southern Fox]

I don't think f*rest understand what the tribunal fee is supposed to be for.

It's not supposed to reflect the value of the player.

The tribunal fee is just compensation for the expenses a club has in training a player. So the compensation amount depends more on how long he's been with the club, and the kind of training he's had, rather than how good he is.

So webby, whats your opinion on what the fee will be!

 

[Malf]

I don't think f*rest understand what the tribunal fee is supposed to be for.

It's not supposed to reflect the value of the player.

The tribunal fee is just compensation for the expenses a club has in training a player. So the compensation amount depends more on how long he's been with the club, and the kind of training he's had, rather than how good he is.

Is value of the player never considered? Because Man Utd had to pay £2 million for Bellion and he had only been at Sunderland for a year or so. I would imagine that Forest won't get anymore than half a million for Williams and perhaps a sell on clause. Matt Taylor only went for £200,000 when Luton claimed they wanted £3 million for him.

 

[webmaster]

I don't think f*rest understand what the tribunal fee is supposed to be for.

It's not supposed to reflect the value of the player.

The tribunal fee is just compensation for the expenses a club has in training a player. So the compensation amount depends more on how long he's been with the club, and the kind of training he's had, rather than how good he is.

Is value of the player never considered? Because Man Utd had to pay £2 million for Bellion and he had only been at Sunderland for a year or so.

Bellion's fee wasn't set by a tribunal.

Man Utd agreed to pay over the odds to make sure they didn't get punished by the FA for making an illegal approach for the player.

Man U originally wanted it to go to a tribunal, but they realised that the FA would then look into all the details of the transfer, so they changed their mind agreed to pay £2 million to make sure they didn't get caught being naughty. As part of the contract Sunderland were not allowed to repeat the illegal approach allegations they'd previously made.

 

[Steven]

I don't think f*rest understand what the tribunal fee is supposed to be for.

It's not supposed to reflect the value of the player.

The tribunal fee is just compensation for the expenses a club has in training a player. So the compensation amount depends more on how long he's been with the club, and the kind of training he's had, rather than how good he is.

Is value of the player never considered? Because Man Utd had to pay £2 million for Bellion and he had only been at Sunderland for a year or so.

Bellion's fee wasn't set by a tribunal.

Man Utd agreed to pay over the odds to make sure they didn't get punished by the FA for making an illegal approach for the player.

Man U originally wanted it to go to a tribunal, but they realised that the FA would then look into all the details of the transfer, so they changed their mind agreed to pay £2 million to make sure they didn't get caught being naughty. As part of the contract Sunderland were not allowed to repeat the illegal approach allegations they'd previously made.

Man U illiegally approaching a player. I can't believe that. :roll:

 

[Malf]

I don't think f*rest understand what the tribunal fee is supposed to be for.

It's not supposed to reflect the value of the player.

The tribunal fee is just compensation for the expenses a club has in training a player. So the compensation amount depends more on how long he's been with the club, and the kind of training he's had, rather than how good he is.

Is value of the player never considered? Because Man Utd had to pay £2 million for Bellion and he had only been at Sunderland for a year or so.

Bellion's fee wasn't set by a tribunal.

Man Utd agreed to pay over the odds to make sure they didn't get punished by the FA for making an illegal approach for the player.

Man U originally wanted it to go to a tribunal, but they realised that the FA would then look into all the details of the transfer, so they changed their mind agreed to pay £2 million to make sure they didn't get caught being naughty. As part of the contract Sunderland were not allowed to repeat the illegal approach allegations they'd previously made.

Aaaah that explains it then, well if thats the case I can't think a tribunal rising above a million so we're laughing. Cheers Webmonger, you've put my mind at rest

 

[Malf]

http://www.nottinghamforest.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10308~532382,00.html

They have finally admitted that he has agreed terms with us, turned our offer down though. Tribunal it is then

 

[Joe_Fox]

Derisory were their words, that's rich!

 

[lazzer]

i bet he's the only bloke in nottingham who knows what that means

 

[Dunc]

Is anyone still pestering that forest forum except me?!

 

[Malf]

Is anyone still pestering that forest forum except me?!

I have been adding the odd post here and there, I go by the name Bifter on there