Can we all just agree that it would all be better if Joey came home?
and we like tits :icon_wink
I've noticed that lately the insults in this forum are getting increasingly high on the Richter Scale - and i put this down to tormented frustration that it's another season and another set of miserable league results.
The debate about playing good football v winning is just nonsensical given our present situation. We are not winning and we are not playing good football. In fact whilst Megson remains in charge there is no likelihood of either occurring.
Just as a matter of interest why was Megson given a reported three years contract ?- I hope that the club has some results based get out clause because Milan has already wasted loads of money on buying largely poor players and sacking people that he has just appointed that I wouldn't like to see him waste more money on paying off yet another failure. And yes I realise that it's his money to waste but on the otherhand the popular support for his takeover was at least partly based on the assumption that his money would make a major difference to the results.
I really think some people would be happy if we got relegated as long as we played nice football. Relegation or staying in this division too long will mean less money for the club and worse players coming in, whilst all the time teams are relegated into this division armed with millions and we will not be able to compete. We have to kick and scratch our way out of this league.
I really think some people would be happy if we got relegated as long as we played nice football. Relegation or staying in this division too long will mean less money for the club and worse players coming in, whilst all the time teams are relegated into this division armed with millions and we will not be able to compete. We have to kick and scratch our way out of this league.
How about if Joey comes home with tits?
I don't think so BG - only the sort of sad head cases who were saying last season that relegation was ok because they would then be able to visit different grounds.
You are right in essence. This close season the club seems to have found it impossible to bring in many decent players - presumably because better players are not keen to join a struggling second tier club - and that is what we are; not mediocre just poor.
I don't think anyone said going down would be OK.
But some idiots keep bringing up a quote of mine when I said *IF* we went down I would enjoy having new grounds to visit. I didn't say I wanted to go down or it would be OK. And I never thought we would go down, unlike a lot of the people here. I was just trying to find positives out of the situation.
I agree with much that you say, however, in the paragraph pulled from your last post, I think that you are being excessively generous. The club's acquisition policy through the summer was unfocused. Nobody forced us to keep signing players and we do not need 40 plus quality players.
It seems that we were signing by committee, with several people deciding which players would be 'good for the club'. This is a task that should be performed by one man; preferably the manager, but if needs must, the chairman.
I don't think anyone said going down would be OK.
But some idiots keep bringing up a quote of mine when I said *IF* we went down I would enjoy having new grounds to visit. I didn't say I wanted to go down or it would be OK. And I never thought we would go down, unlike a lot of the people here. I was just trying to find positives out of the situation.
Ha ha ha - Redditch wants RK back.....
Well, he was very enthusiastic about him.
TBH I think the main problem is and has been for quite some time, our home form. We have not since the year we moved in, made the Walkers a 'tough' place to come for the opposition. This is the most notable problem we have IMO.
Think of it as a recruitment process with a job apllication form/person specification (quite appropriate, as we may well get through a few candidates this season)
Winning League matches, and getting promoted are the only essential criteria
Playing nice football, a lovely cup run, communicating with fans, plus everything else that you can think of, are merely desirable criteria
At the moment no-one has got through the initial sift
It's funny you should mention the recruitment process, because it's changed these days. We no longer follow the criteria we have done over the past few years. One man makes all the decisions now
Thank feck for that
It's hardly proved to be a runaway success has it ?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 24 | 50 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Manchester C | 24 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 24 | 31 |
12 | Palace | 24 | 30 |
13 | Manchester U | 24 | 29 |
14 | Tottenham | 24 | 27 |
15 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
16 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |