KempsonFox
New Member
He's bit of a crock though. Injury-prone.
If Michael Owen insists he is not injury prone then I'm claiming that too.
He's bit of a crock though. Injury-prone.
If Michael Owen insists he is not injury prone then I'm claiming that too.
Short-term thinking and unneccessary moaning.
I can't understand why anyone would even slightly entertain the idea of selling King when he is only 20, was magnificent on the whole last season and is only going to get better.
And if O'Neill is interested, it backs that up. He's hardly what you would call a bad judge of a player is he?
We have had lots of crap young players through the ranks in recent years, and King is not one of them. Given the choice of keeping him or Mattock, it would be King nine times out of ten for me.
My sentiments exactly, how many times have we sold on a young player who some people think is shit only for them to do very well at another club?
[B said:Boy Genius[/B];838542]he is a **** and you know it, you don't watch city too often do you?
I went down often enough to gauge that for a lad having his first full season, despite having a tendency to go missing in games on occasion, he has two good feet, is a good passer, without question knows where the goal is, and is more than reasonable in the air. He's got potential and it strikes me as a typically myopic and moronic assessment of him to say 'get rid'.
Many thanks for the assumptions of me though, truly appreciated. I take it your username is drizzled in irony, yes?
Like who?
Like who?
Heath? :icon_lol::icon_lol:
O'Gravy.....
Dodds.........
I would answer that, but i would suggest thet Jeff could answer far more articulately and factually accurately than me, Jeff?
The suspense is killing me....who is it going to be
A quid says he mentions Lineker......
Like who?
how many times have we sold on a young player who some people think is shit only for them to do very well at another club?
Hardly any.
But the young players we've sold in recent years have been mainly squad players, not first team regulars.
King is a regular in the first team and is a class above most of the young players we've had in recent years.
Is that it? I was expecting somebody everyone had forgotten that would prove 100% that Camberwell was correct
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |