beaumontfox
New Member
I thought he had a decent enough game. Held off the defender well for his goal.
Depends where NP plays him I suppose.
Depends where NP plays him I suppose.
I was interested in tedfoxxx comment that Dany had a good game. Is that based on commentary or did ted see the game. Do other people who saw the game agree.
The reason I am interested is that I think Dany could become our best winger. (Obviously I am not including Solano since we have not seen him play). He has sometimes been slow to read the game and this often gives players an impression of laziness. This will hopefully improve with games and he desperately needs games.
What about Kermo?
They were saying on RL how he was dropping very deep again, and doesn't ever get that close to his strike partner, instead tends to drop off a lot.
That could be why the long balls were going to Waghorn, not Kermo?
I asked this in the match thread, but is Kermogant actually any good? I've not really seen anything of him, and there never tends to be much comment about him, good or bad, on here... but's he yet to score, and I've not heard about him doing anything that makes much of an impact?
Highlights here.......if you can understand it
http://www.s4c.co.uk/clic/e_level2.shtml?series_id=355698814
Tua chwe'deg o gant. Pan mae Hartson ar y sioe, mae tua naw deg o gant, eh Glyn?I can't. Can you?
Must have been reading a badly translated transcript of S4C's commentary.From the BBC report on the game:
"Nigel Pearson's men responded positively and were level just after the half-hour mark as Paul Gallagher's free-kick picked out Morrison and the defender slotted home with a neat right-footed finish."
I'm having difficulty in resolving that statement in view of what I've just seen on Sgorio Cymru. I presume it was written by a mate of Stringer's.
Tua chwe'deg o gant. Pan mae Hartson ar y sioe, mae tua naw deg o gant, eh Glyn?
Here Beaumont - you're famous.......
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/fudforum/inde...79&S=07bbec3d8e5b7b2ad20fd1ac0ae59f7a&start=0
Played well, we no way deserved to lose this, should have had a blatant penalty don't know why it wasn't given, gutted at the time we lost but on reflection a draw would have created more fixture congestion.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |