Shame they don't do it here, 1) becuase I'd have one for free and 2) would be priceless to see numpties kicking off about people using them in the seating areas.
I'm pretty sure they are banned but I was more referring to the numpties that would claim it is killing them, as there would be many that would.
The expression 'numpties' would probably more appropriately attached to those who suck these new things that are not yet fully tested and think they should be allowed to do so where smoking is banned. It already looks certain that once the ptb get their arse in gear, such items will only be available from pharmacies.
Don't believe everything you read in the papers, the tobacco industry and governments have a hell of a lot at stake here if someone/thing else wants a slice of their pie and I'd imagine it is the exact reason why it will be classed as a medicine.
I'd be much more worried about what I am breathing whilst I am walking to the game or waiting at the train station to be honest compared to what is pretty much the same as what rises from a tea, coffee or football ground favourite, Bovril.
Don't believe everything you read in the papers, the tobacco industry and governments have a hell of a lot at stake here if someone/thing else wants a slice of their pie and I'd imagine it is the exact reason why it will be classed as a medicine.
I'd be much more worried about what I am breathing whilst I am walking to the game or waiting at the train station to be honest compared to what is pretty much the same as what rises from a tea, coffee or football ground favourite, Bovril.
And if you believe your last sentence to be true, keep sucking. You deserve it.
Out of interest, where are the esmokers getting their information from that is to be trusted? I'm assuming they aren't free? Won't they have a vested interest in making people people they are harmless?
Plenty of reports out there to say they have minimal impact compared to actual ciggies.
Of course they won't be harmless, but don't forget that everything gives you cancer nowadays.
And as a non e-cig smoker I can't think of a vested interest.
Plenty of reports out there to say they have minimal impact compared to actual ciggies.
Of course they won't be harmless, but don't forget that everything gives you cancer nowadays.
And as a non e-cig smoker I can't think of a vested interest.
You don't think that the want people to buy them?
e-cigs are designed to wean smokers off tobacco. They may well be safer than tobacco but they are certainly addictive in themselves and I give you credit for recognising that "won't be harmless".
My feeling is that their safety should have been established before they were marketed.
e-cigs are designed to wean smokers off tobacco. They may well be safer than tobacco but they are certainly addictive in themselves and I give you credit for recognising that "won't be harmless".
My feeling is that their safety should have been established before they were marketed.
Nicotine in itself isn't addictive, ecigs may be habit forming but are unlikely to be addictive.
My feeling is that their safety should have been established before they were marketed.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |