It is was it is commonly known in the trade as "The Jason Mcateer Effect".Right, I'm confused. Was this released and then withdrawn from the OS I take it and if so, why?
It is was it is commonly known in the trade as "The Jason Mcateer Effect".
Always avoidable, except with Leicester City.
We said we'd signed Mcateer before he signed and then we lost him to another clubRight, 'it is was it is'? What are you on about now? Have we been taken over??
We said we'd signed Mcateer before he signed and then we lost him to another club
I didn't specify a reason Babs, I simply said I thought we'd announced the news too soon againHe failed his medical actually.
The print screen isn't a fake, here's a picture of the guy holding the shirt:
http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa14/dunkley_lcfc/lcfc1.jpg (credit to MRD on FT)
Shirt looking much better as royal blue as well.
The print screen isn't a fake, here's a picture of the guy holding the shirt:
http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa14/dunkley_lcfc/lcfc1.jpg (credit to MRD on FT)
Shirt looking much better as royal blue as well.
The print screen isn't a fake, here's a picture of the guy holding the shirt:
http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa14/dunkley_lcfc/lcfc1.jpg (credit to MRD on FT)
Shirt looking much better as royal blue as well.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 22 | 53 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 23 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 23 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 23 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 23 | 37 |
9 | Brighton | 23 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 23 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 22 | 23 |
17 | Leicester | 23 | 17 |
18 | Wolves | 23 | 16 |
19 | Ipswich | 23 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 23 | 6 |