Football Rumours

Who Is It aimed At

  • Total voters
    29
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stalin said:
You have received an infraction at Talking Balls
Dear Boy Genius,

You have received an infraction at Talking Balls.

Reason: Inappropriate Language
-------
Not funny to agree with someone abusing another forum member
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showthread.php?p=489874
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummindefender
can we conclude from this poll then that steven is in fact a **** :102:


:038::038::038:
All the best,
Talking Balls.
Click to expand...

we must have hit on a sore point
 
Jeff said:
I've now added an age lock to the general chat forum. This forum is now available to over 16s only, so the rules are more relaxed here now.

1. Post anything you like, be as offensive as you like, post any pictures you like.

2. If you're offended by anything you see here, please stick to the parts of the site where offensive/adult content is not allowed.

[edited to clarify] - 3. this is not a completely rule free forum - the rules on racist posts, libel, spam and several others still apply - but you can now treat the general chat forum as an adult forum without worrying about offending people.
Click to expand...

right lets look at this point by point

1. yep thats right there
2. Hint
3. right ok-was i racist? no libel? no was it spam no? the several others that i apply lack clarity-does that include calling people a **** as a joke:102:-because it does say and i quote "you can now treat the general chat forum as an adult forum without worrying about offending people"

as far as i can see i, melton and bg have done nothing wrong
 
drummindefender said:
right lets look at this point by point

1. yep thats right there
2. Hint
3. right ok-was i racist? no libel? no was it spam no? the several others that i apply lack clarity-does that include calling people a **** as a joke:102:-because it does say and i quote "you can now treat the general chat forum as an adult forum without worrying about offending people"

as far as i can see i, melton and bg have done nothing wrong
Click to expand...

i agree, might red card jessel for a laugh anyway though :icon_lol:
 
drummindefender said:
as far as i can see i, melton and bg have done nothing wrong
Click to expand...
So if you're theory is right, we could call Steven a **** anywhere in general chat and not recieve any punishment for it :102:

Seems a little harsh to me. I think 95% of the members will now be calling him a **** just for the fun of it. So for that reason I won't be calling him a **** because it wil get boring and not very nice for Steven.
 
Melton Fox said:
So if you're theory is right, we could call Steven a **** anywhere in general chat and not recieve any punishment for it :102:

Seems a little harsh to me. I think 95% of the members will now be calling him a **** just for the fun of it. So for that reason I won't be calling him a **** because it wil get boring and not very nice for Steven.
Click to expand...
there the rules of general chat though
 
Melton Fox said:
So if you're theory is right, we could call Steven a **** anywhere in general chat and not recieve any punishment for it :102:
Click to expand...

The change to the rules was to make this part of ths site more appropriate for 'adult' content, without worrying about offending kids, or worrying about bad language etc.

That doesn't mean it's open season to go out of your way to be offensive to people. But having said that I think Steven over-reacted on this occasion, to a post that looked light hearted to me.
 
Jeff said:
The change to the rules was to make this part of ths site more appropriate for 'adult' content, without worrying about offending kids, or worrying about bad language etc.

That doesn't mean it's open season to go out of your way to be offensive to people. But having said that I think Steven over-reacted on this occasion, to a post that looked light hearted to me.
Click to expand...
thank you
 
Jeff said:
The change to the rules was to make this part of ths site more appropriate for 'adult' content, without worrying about offending kids, or worrying about bad language etc.

That doesn't mean it's open season to go out of your way to be offensive to people. But having said that I think Steven over-reacted on this occasion, to a post that looked light hearted to me.
Click to expand...


Well said Jeff, :038::038::038:


what about a charge then of abuse of power, they hung Saddam for that
 
Last edited:
bloody missed it, seems like a good night had by all, apart form stevie of course.


this reminds me, how come melts never got one for calling me a wanker, and that wasnt even in general chat :icon_bigg maybe it's because im not a little girl
 
Last edited:
lako42 said:
bloody missed it, seems like a good night had by all, apart form stevie of course.


this reminds me, how come melts never got one for calling me a wanker, and that wasnt even in general chat :icon_bigg maybe it's because im not a little girl
Click to expand...
Apparently if it's factually correct it can't be classed as an insult :icon_wink
 
I hope all the passive agressive's that enjoy abusing me feel better about themselves now. I fully understand what you and your ilk are like.

If you do not like me moderating then I suggest you ask Webbie to remove me from the moderators list. Nobody should have to put up with this crap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top