fowler would fit in to the same position as all the new signings,wait and see and dont prejudge.Fowler is Liverpool thru and thru and i cant see him having any great desire to bust a gut for anyone else. Fowler the name sounds a good asset, but Fowler the actual product is far more questionable imo.
Fowler is Liverpool thru and thru and i cant see him having any great desire to bust a gut for anyone else. Fowler the name sounds a good asset, but Fowler the actual product is far more questionable imo.
Fowler is Liverpool thru and thru and i cant see him having any great desire to bust a gut for anyone else.
somebody should start a thread 'you can please some of the people some of the time but you cant please all of the people all of the time'
He was an Everton fan as a kid, so if he could bust a gut for Liverpool he should be able to for anyone.
but where would their future lie a good season with us and someone snaps them you are back square one
like the 11 million we had ploughed back in from heskey
somebody should start a thread 'you can please some of the people some of the time but you cant please all of the people all of the time'
The club never spent the Heskey money because they had some ridiculous salaries to pay for some very average players.
dont get me wrong brauny your opinion has some weight.im not saying fowler is right or wrong for us at this time.what i am and have been saying is whoever the manager and chairman bring in is their choice and they will be held accountable.fowler would be a gamble but sometimes gambles pay off.i as a fan, and loyal fan at that have allways reserved my opinion untill the player has proved his worth or proved a bad buy.No Biff i'm not hard to please, imo Fowler is the wrong type of signing for city. Fowler was one of the best finishers in the country without doubt, but i want our strikers to have a future infront of them. If we have to go down the 30+ route again then i would prefer to have experience in mainly defence and possibly midfield but not up front. Fowlers career is on the downward slope and i think that many people will easily be suckered by the name of a former top player. My question would be what as he done in the last 4 or 5 years. Lets spend our money on ambition, and not the past.
Fowler is Liverpool thru and thru and i cant see him having any great desire to bust a gut for anyone else. Fowler the name sounds a good asset, but Fowler the actual product is far more questionable imo.
Fowler the name sounds a good asset, but Fowler the actual product is far more questionable imo.
If Fowler signs for Leicester (which he wont) ill eat my left testicle.
tomato sauce to help it go down is allowed to be used if he did sign (which he wont)
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
16 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |