Singth
Active Member
Yes
Fryatt ....will he stay ?
- Thread starter Brauny Blue
- Start date
- Status
Yes
Hazzman
New Member
:icon_lol::icon_lol:
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
That's a very important question, I was hoping someone would ask.
Matt_B
Well-Known Member
Also Wolves look a good bet to get promoted, why would they want a striker who is yet to be proven at Championship level let alone Prem.
highland fox
New Member
Yes,she said she would let Singth sleep with her but it would cost him £200
Last edited:
highland fox
New Member
As an option,he's not going to cost a lot and they may let one of the others go
ch4mbo
Member
Listening to the radio this morning, and that Stringer was quizzing him over a new contract and from Fryatt's responce it is certain he doesn't want to be here. the strangest thing is that last season when the team was having a mare and he wasn't playing much, the crowd would often chant his name.. "du du du du matty fraytt" and all that, in order to try and force hollman to put him on. This season to be fair he's doing the business and everyone's having a pop. Having said all that I also agree with melts, I don't feel he's unreplacable, and the only frustration is that burning question: is he playing as well as he is because he wants out?
And in answer to the poll above, It depends on how much we would get for him. But as he's only 22 we will get something even if he leaves at the end of the season. Just a thought, has walsall got any sell on fee due?
And in answer to the poll above, It depends on how much we would get for him. But as he's only 22 we will get something even if he leaves at the end of the season. Just a thought, has walsall got any sell on fee due?
Redditch Fox
Well-Known Member
I think we should disregard all this stuff about whether he's good enough for the so called 'championship'. It isn't very relevant at the moment.
The point is that we're reliant on his goals to get us out of the third division.
No player is irreplaceable but we would have great difficulty in bringing in a prolific goalscorer to our club particularly in the January window.
I fear if Fryatt goes - and undoubtedly that opportunity is going to arise - then we are unlikely to be promoted.
The point is that we're reliant on his goals to get us out of the third division.
No player is irreplaceable but we would have great difficulty in bringing in a prolific goalscorer to our club particularly in the January window.
I fear if Fryatt goes - and undoubtedly that opportunity is going to arise - then we are unlikely to be promoted.
Willlow
Well-Known Member
:icon_lol::icon_lol: I would gladly take any of the main 4 strikers they currently have over Fryatt.
As Beighton pointed out Wolves are aiming for the Prem, why would they want a good League 1 striker?
Singth
Active Member
I don't know maybe they think he is good enough? Maybe it's us thinking like that that's the cause for him wanting to leave?
highland fox
New Member
For the amount he's going to cost them if he chips in with 5 goals and it helps them get promoted then its a drop in the ocean to what they will get for reaching the Premier.Its just your opinion that there other 4 strikers are better,Mick McCarthy may think otherwise
highland fox
New Member
I would imagine that if we deny him a move out of here,he will 'down tools'.I see no point in keeping a player who clearly does not want to be here.
Matt_B
Well-Known Member
His on pitch activity is not that of someone who doesn't want to be here.
highland fox
New Member
Because he's trying to attract other clubs ?
enderby fox
New Member
From the whispers i've got from within the city, its true he's off to Wolves but not sure weather it is in jan or at the end of the season. The replacement lined up is Ricky Lambert for 500k and then if that falls through its Mackail-Smith from the posh. lambert is keen to come here though apprently
Again this is from a friend of a friend of someone that has contacts within the club. Take it as you see it for now. i'm always sceptical but i do think this one might be true this time and he told me nigel pearson was the man lined up 3 days before he was appointed so he has some knowledge down there, but he also told me howard had been sold to norwich before the start of the season too and he got that wrong.
Again this is from a friend of a friend of someone that has contacts within the club. Take it as you see it for now. i'm always sceptical but i do think this one might be true this time and he told me nigel pearson was the man lined up 3 days before he was appointed so he has some knowledge down there, but he also told me howard had been sold to norwich before the start of the season too and he got that wrong.
highland fox
New Member
Can't see Lambert coming whilst Howard is here
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
Is this the same bloke who told the Daily Star we'd signed Wilcox for £4 million from Leeds about 7 years ago, a story which they went on and printed as fact despite neither the player nor the club ever having even suggested let alone confirmed it? I love unfounded rumours me :icon_bigg
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
| 2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
| 5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
| 7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
| 13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
| 15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
| 16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
| 17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
| 18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |
