Given a straight choice...

MM or the FT's vision?

  • The FT's Vision

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • Mandaric

    Votes: 32 86.5%

  • Total voters
    37
Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
We've always been a selling club when we're in this division, and often in the top division too, so I don't think the fact that we might have to sell a player puts us in jeopardy, it just puts us where we've been for most of the time the club's been around.
Dopesn't mean I'm happy about selling players, just that it's not an unusual position for us to be in. Anyone who thinks we've survived in the past without selling players has got a short memory.

Perhaps you could give us some examples of players that have been sold to balance the books?
 
Perhaps you could give us some examples of players that have been sold to balance the books?

The most recent examples have been when we got relegated and had to sell players, Matt Piper, Robbie Savage, Gary Rowett.

In the eighties it seemed to be a regular thing to sell our best player every year or two to make ends meet, this included the likes of Gary Lineker, Alan Smith, Gary McAllister, Mike Newell, Kevin MacDonald etc. Maybe the likes of Lineker would have gone anyway - but we'd have had to sell someone else instead.

Maybe someone else can comment on the seventies regarding players like Shilton, Clarke, Nish etc.
 
The most recent examples have been when we got relegated and had to sell players, Matt Piper, Robbie Savage, Gary Rowett.

In the eighties it seemed to be a regular thing to sell our best player every year or two to make ends meet, this included the likes of Gary Lineker, Alan Smith, Gary McAllister, Mike Newell, Kevin MacDonald etc. Maybe the likes of Lineker would have gone anyway - but we'd have had to sell someone else instead.

Maybe someone else can comment on the seventies regarding players like Shilton, Clarke, Nish etc.

I'd say the baulk of those wanted to leave as much as us having to sell them, apart from Piper of course but every club has to sell players when they lose the PL cash.
 
I'd say the baulk of those wanted to leave as much as us having to sell them, apart from Piper of course but every club has to sell players when they lose the PL cash.

Whether they wanted to move or not the fact is they needed to be sold to balance the books. On no occasion after selling those players was all of the transfer fee put back into the team.
 
David Connolly is the only recent one I can think of that was sold purely for money.

And he was gimp that couldn't hit a barn door
 
Last edited:
Whether they wanted to move or not the fact is they needed to be sold to balance the books. On no occasion after selling those players was all of the transfer fee put back into the team.

Fair enough. Probably explains why we never achieved anything during those periods.
 
Well according to the Foxes Trust post that was posted on this forum yesterday, without some form of investment we would be in a position in January where there would have to be player sales and we would be in a position where unless an extreme emergency we would not be able to make any additional signings.

My concerns with a rights issue would be that the money generated would actually be set aside to prevent player sales and to cover the obvious budget shortfalls as oppose to being made available for squad strengthening, whilst it would keep the club afloat for a season or two the likelihood would be that it would merely delay the inevitable and sooner rather than later the better players in the squad such as Stearman, McCarthy, Kisnorbo and Hume would seek pastures new as they realised we could not match their ambitions.
 
Well according to the Foxes Trust post that was posted on this forum yesterday, without some form of investment we would be in a position in January where there would have to be player sales and we would be in a position where unless an extreme emergency we would not be able to make any additional signings.

My concerns with a rights issue would be that the money generated would actually be set aside to prevent player sales and to cover the obvious budget shortfalls as oppose to being made available for squad strengthening, whilst it would keep the club afloat for a season or two the likelihood would be that it would merely delay the inevitable and sooner rather than later the better players in the squad such as Stearman, McCarthy, Kisnorbo and Hume would seek pastures new as they realised we could not match their ambitions.

Spot on Steve, we would just be undoing what good work has ben done over the last 18 months or so.
 
I can't see any ambition from our board at all. I haven't seen any from day one. I want rid of them and the sooner the better
 
I can't see any ambition from our board at all. I haven't seen any from day one. I want rid of them and the sooner the better

I thank them for what they've done and reognise that due to financial restraints they havent been able to move us forward. I hope they realise this on Saturday.
 
I hope its gets sorted out soon because everybody going over the same information is starting to get boring!
 
I hope its gets sorted out soon because everybody going over the same information is starting to get boring!

You wanna be careful Will, if Norman Leet sees your post he'l go mental :icon_wink
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226
Back
Top