Jo Bucci

[Joe_Fox]

and beastly

and macarbe.

 

[pipes]

and macarbe.

thats me :thumbs_up

 

[MKFox]

and macarbe.

not macabre then?

 

[Boy Genius]

and macarbe.

used to play fro Roma.....:icon_razz

 

[drummindefender]

Fc*k!..........can the last one back from the Luton game please screw my lid down?....I'm toast....(Without happy faces drawn on it)...12-16 yo's.. Why don't they abandon the Post Horn Gallop and introduce a nice sedate rap tune..(with supressed gunfire?) I am prepared to go on record as saying "This woman" will not be here by the start of the next season.

excuse me but don't tar the whole of my generation with the same stick-were not all like that.

 

[Cate Fox]

I dive deep, I would take her up the Stoney Cove any day...:icon_razz

Would you tie a weight to her and let her sink??? All in the good name of the club of course..... :icon_conf

 

[MKFox]

Would you tie a weight to her and let her sink???

You into the kinky stuff too then Cate? :icon_wink

 

[Cate Fox]

:icon_eek:

no MK, I'm not...:icon_conf

 

[Boy Genius]

Would you tie a weight to her and let her sink??? All in the good name of the club of course..... :icon_conf

depends where she sinks to.........:icon_razz

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

Has she got a nice rack?:icon_wink

I would give her one....





























out of ten :icon_lol:

 

[Foxes_Trust]

Whats even more worrying is that FT gives her the time of day when they know she is responsible for trying to get rid of Birch and Andrew Neville.

Suck up sounds about right to me.........................

They should have asked her how long her contract was and who appointed her. That way we know who to blame when we have Pierpont II throwing her weight about. It would be interesting to know how RK feels about all this.

How can FT trust anything the club tell them when TNBD has been telling everyone there are no redundancies (even got RL saying it was rubbish) and Peter Jones saying the same thing. We all know now that he was just being economical with the truth.

It's not about sucking up, we have to build a relationship with all people in key positions in LCFC, try to gain their confidence & influence their future decision making. We have already offered Jo our time in terms of being a sounding board for ideas & have said we will give her our honest opinion on any topic, whether that opinion be supportive or totally against the idea.

We know who appointed her, the decision was made by the entire board based on the recommendations of the team that carried out the interviews, the interview team certainly included Tim Davies & Greg Clarke, we also believe Jim MaCahill & Martin Glenn may have taken part.

We have contacts at various levels within the club, so have heard about recent events from several sources now, but have been asked not to release details & we have to abide by that request otherwise those who have talked to us wouldn't be so open.

 

[bocadillo]

We have contacts at various levels within the club, so have heard about recent events from several sources now, but have been asked not to release details & we have to abide by that request otherwise those who have talked to us wouldn't be so open.

What you are saying is that you are unable to 'name names' despite your persistent insistence that other people should do so a week ago. Is that correct?

 

[Boy Genius]

What you are saying is that you are unable to 'name names' despite your persistent insistence that other people should do so a week ago. Is that correct?

One rule for us and one rule for FT.... not a true voice of the fan if they wont say anything.
No prawn sandwiches at the Reading game...

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

So FT you are no longer denying that the rumours did contain some if not a lot of truth.

 

[Foxes_Trust]

What you are saying is that you are unable to 'name names' despite your persistent insistence that other people should do so a week ago. Is that correct?

Nobody else would reveal their sources would they, so why should we?

The best description we can give is that we have spoken to people who are totally the opposite ends of the spectrum in relation to recent events. All of them don't wish us to comment publically about the conversations but wanted us to have a good insight.

 

[Foxes_Trust]

One rule for us and one rule for FT.... not a true voice of the fan if they wont say anything.
No prawn sandwiches at the Reading game...

No same rules for all - nobody revealed sources !

 

[Boy Genius]

Nobody else would reveal their sources would they, so why should we?

The best description we can give is that we have spoken to people who are totally the opposite ends of the spectrum in relation to recent events. All of them don't wish us to comment publically about the conversations but wanted us to have a good insight.

why did they want the FT to have a good insight into the alledged situation. Is it that bad and so sentative that they have to get the story out via third parties then?
This tells me the situation is a lot worse than I expected

 

[Boy Genius]

No same rules for all - nobody revealed sources !

so why were you banging on asking for the names of the sources then?

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

Nobody else would reveal their sources would they, so why should we?

The best description we can give is that we have spoken to people who are totally the opposite ends of the spectrum in relation to recent events. All of them don't wish us to comment publically about the conversations but wanted us to have a good insight.

Sounds very fcuking serious !

 

[Boy Genius]

Sounds very fcuking serious !

my thoughts exactly.