Jo Bucci

[Foxes_Trust]

So FT you are no longer denying that the rumours did contain some if not a lot of truth.

We still require further conversations to ensure we are possession of all the facts, we are seeking to establish if all sides will confirm certain events took place.

Certain inaccruacies in the original post have subsequently been corrected, such as no redundancy notices were issued which all sides have stated to us.

Our intention is to continue to clarify & enable us to raise our areas of concern in the next LCFC board meeting next month, as we feel this is the most appropriate forum to examine the handling of situation

 

[Foxes_Trust]

so why were you banging on asking for the names of the sources then?

To enable us to verify what went on

We have continued to investigate, but the more sources of information we have, the more of the jigsaw falls into place and that should leave us with bits that don't fit (i.e those who are providing mis-information)

 

[Boy Genius]

We still require further conversations to ensure we are possession of all the facts, we are seeking to establish if all sides will confirm certain events took place.

Certain inaccruacies in the original post have subsequently been corrected, such as no redundancy notices were issued which all sides have stated to us.

Our intention is to continue to clarify & enable us to raise our areas of concern in the next LCFC board meeting next month, as we feel this is the most appropriate forum to examine the handling of situation

It seems to me that nobody really tells the FT much at all, and you have to keep asking questions to gain information. Do the board and other executives fully trust the FT?

 

[Durham Fox]

This whole thing is a f*cking joke. The current administration of the club have a hell of a lot to answer for!!


BUCCI OUT

 

[Boy Genius]

To enable us to verify what went on

We have continued to investigate, but the more sources of information we have, the more of the jigsaw falls into place and that should leave us with bits that don't fit (i.e those who are providing mis-information)

So you were in the dark about it as much as we were. Otherwise you would have known what had been going off.

 

[Foxes_Trust]

It seems to me that nobody really tells the FT much at all, and you have to keep asking questions to gain information. Do the board and other executives fully trust the FT?

We don't believe it was the board/executives who were feeding stories to fans to post on message boards (have to assume this as we didn't get the sources from the posters)

Different fans have different friends within the club who seemed to be revealing snippets, plus a couple of posters on here obviously grace the offices of LCFC on a regular basis.

Some of our non board member/executive contacts within the club were staying very tight lipped on this one, that could be the fear factor given a re-structure is underway.

We felt it was important to gather as much information as possible so we are in a position to challenge people about what they are telling us and in doing so get a fuller picture of events

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

Based on the information you are now aware of, do you believe the planned changes /restructure and events of last week were / are in the short and long term benefit of the club.

 

[Foxes_Trust]

So you were in the dark about it as much as we were. Otherwise you would have known what had been going off.

When the story initially broke, yes and the initial reaction we got from the club involved carpets & brushes, but we weren't satisified with that & still have plenty of questions to ask.

Our current belief is that several parties were at fault but not everyone caught up in the stories, however still fact finding/confirming

 

[Foxes_Trust]

Based on the information you are now aware of, do you believe the planned changes /restructure and events of last week were / are in the short and long term benefit of the club.

We will be meeting Jo Bucci again who has agreed to outline the planned re-structure to us, can't comment until we know what was/is actually planned.

Long term benefit - answer could be yes, if you include learning from mistakes in procedures being followed.

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

When the story initially broke, yes and the initial reaction we got from the club involved carpets & brushes, but we weren't satisified with that & still have plenty of questions to ask.

Our current belief is that several parties were at fault but not everyone caught up in the stories, however still fact finding/confirming

As we know there were rumoured to be various side issues that arose from the alledged events such as offers of the team not travelling to Ipswich and certain individuals visiting / contacting the club to voice their disapproval and dissatisfaction at the way the club was being ran.

Can the FT confirm as to whether the reaction to the alledged events was indeed as strong and passionate as was alluded to in the rumours that were posted.

Could this above situation, be the reason why all of a sudden Mike Newells' name is being linked with the job as manager, seems a coincidence that three newspapers are scremongering, is the club putting pressure on kelly to tow the line, or maybe he has turned down the offer to continue after the summer because of the events currently going on behind the scenes, hence the rumours of Newell resurfacing.

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

We will be meeting Jo Bucci again who has agreed to outline the planned re-structure to us, can't comment until we know what was/is actually planned.

Long term benefit - answer could be yes, if you include learning from mistakes in procedures being followed.

But you are aware of last weeks incident, In your opinion would the consequences of last weeks planned action been benficial to the club, bearing in mind you are aware of positions and responsibilities these people hold within the club.

 

[bocadillo]

Nobody else would reveal their sources would they, so why should we?

I'm not suggesting that you should - just that you're totally out of touch with the real world in thinking that others should or would.

 

[bocadillo]

To enable us to verify what went on

We have continued to investigate, but the more sources of information we have, the more of the jigsaw falls into place and that should leave us with bits that don't fit (i.e those who are providing mis-information)

"Those who are providing misinformation"? That term seems to apply well to Tim Davies and the Foxes Trust, who when this story broke repeatedly said that nothing was going on.

By what criteria are you going to judge "bits that don't fit"? Are you going to place your trust in those who at first tried to cover up the whole affair?

 

[bocadillo]

No same rules for all - nobody revealed sources !

Hey!! Hang about!!

It was you who was trying to set the rules. When you wanted the sources, those were the rules. Now the boot is on the other foot, it seems to have changed.

It seems that in the mind of the Foxes Trust that two wrongs do amke a right.

 

[bocadillo]

We still require further conversations to ensure we are possession of all the facts, we are seeking to establish if all sides will confirm certain events took place.

Certain inaccruacies in the original post have subsequently been corrected, such as no redundancy notices were issued which all sides have stated to us.

Our intention is to continue to clarify & enable us to raise our areas of concern in the next LCFC board meeting next month, as we feel this is the most appropriate forum to examine the handling of situation

Please clarify which "original post" you are referring to. Neither the original post in this thread, nor the original post in the "What's going on thread" (which started the ball rolling in this forum) contains any mention of redundancy notices.

 

[bocadillo]

It seems to me that nobody really tells the FT much at all, and you have to keep asking questions to gain information. Do the board and other executives fully trust the FT?

I think a more pertinent question might be whether the fans really trust the FT.

 

[Hazzman]

I have bought the club.

 

[Joe_Fox]

I have bought the club.

Hazzman, can I have a job please, say £100K a year? I've got a GCSE in business stuides and did work experience at KPMG. Can I? Please? :icon_lol:

 

[Hazzman]

Hazzman, can I have a job please, say £100K a year? I've got a GCSE in business stuides and did work experience at KPMG. Can I? Please? :icon_lol:

Sure Joe, I will be Jim McCahill and you can be Tim Davies.

 

[Leesoh]

Can I be Jo Bucci? I'm not in a good mood today, and think I will be ideal for the role.

thank you.