Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Oh no! They've killed KennyKenny.
Oh no! They've killed KennyKenny.
Not seen this posted, but this looks like a pretty strong statement that he's staying: http://www.thisisleicestershire.co....tory-19410167-detail/story.html#axzz2XUe718Hm
Thank God. (Other deities are available)
The difference is when he left Leeds Grayson forced him out, saying he wasn't good enough, before buying Andy Lonergan. When he left Notts he joined a far bigger club - Leeds. It's not the same this time, because Hull are arguably a smaller club, they're just temporarily in a higher division.My concern with Kasper is that he went through this same back and forth when he left Notts County and when he left Leeds. He's very good at acting innocent, and whether he wants to leave or not, he or his agent certainly know how to play the system.
If Kasper does go now, he gets that little bit closer to earning the 'journeyman' tag
Very ture. Within football it has taken on negative connotations. Does anyone know how this happened?Only to people who don't know the proper meaning of 'journeyman'.
Very ture. Within football it has taken on negative connotations. Does anyone know how this happened?
Ah, that seems obvious now you've said it.Stupidity. People see 'journey' and think it means someone who moves around a lot.
Classic overhyped youngster. See also: Freddie Adu, Francis Jeffers etc.
For those people unaware of the proper definition:
jour·ney·man
/ˈjərnēmən/
Noun
A trained worker who is employed by someone else.
A worker or sports player who is reliable but not outstanding.
So that's what wikipedia thinks a journeyman is, is it?
It's nothing of the sort.
A journeyman is unlikely to be formally employed by anybody. He is somebody who does a day's work for a day's pay. He is likely to do work for a number of people. Whether he is trained or not is irrelevant.
A journeyman is unlikely to be formally employed by anybody. He is somebody who does a day's work for a day's pay. He is likely to do work for a number of people. Whether he is trained or not is irrelevant.
The word has the same etymology as the word 'journey'. From the French 'journée' which translates to 'day' in English, a journey was originally the distance that could be travelled in one day.
Would you prefer the Oxford Dictionary definition?
1a worker or sports player who is reliable but not outstanding:
[as modifier]:
a solid journeyman professional
2 historical a trained worker who is employed by someone else:
[as modifier]:
a journeyman carpenter
journeymen printers
Or the Collins dictionary definition?
a craftsman, artisan, etc, who is qualified to work at his trade in the employment of another
a competent workman
(formerly) a worker hired on a daily wage
All except the single last sentence reflect common usage by people who have no idea what the word means. A labourer who worked one day here and one day there would be a journeyman; training, level of skill, qualification etc are all irrelevant in the proper meaning of the word.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |