spionfox
Well-Known Member
but the wise thing and keegan was always going to mean he'd lose(ashley)
Well we agree on that :icon_lol:
but the wise thing and keegan was always going to mean he'd lose(ashley)
By appointing a director of football and another one to oversee signings without Keegans approval. Recipe for disaster especially when one of them was a certain D Wise formerly of this parish.
Ashley should have known how parochial the Toon fans are so bringing in a cockney **** and an Italian over 'King' Kevs head was never going to play well with the fans.
D Wise has been a scapegoat in this whole affair.
You have to remember that some people don't actually believe what they are saying. They are just saying it to be different and attract attention, hence their appearance half way through threads as opposed to at the beginning.I never thought I would ever witness a Leicester supporter making a comment like that
Scapegoat or not he deserves all the shit that comes his way.
You have to remember that some people don't actually believe what they are saying. They are just saying it to be different and attract attention, hence their appearance half way through threads as opposed to at the beginning.
How do you work that out?That role is fully filled by yourself
Tamworth, it's fact that signings were made by Wise without Keegan's approval. Keegan declared it in a statement and Newcastle Utd haven't claimed libel which suggests it's the truth. Also Ashley has ignored this slice of the story in his recent statement. Wise hasn't been a scapegoat as the fans anger has been directed at all of the 'Cockney Mafia' of Jimenez, Wise and various other ****s under shitty titles.
How do you work that out?
I raise my opinions before I take in those of others, and I believe in what I say.
"Know Your Enemy"
Mike Ashley is in charge of Newcastle Utd not KK.
I personally thought a Chairmans role is to select transfer fees for ins and outs. Select ideal players to come in, then it is the managers role to manage the squad to the best of his ability.
Is this not how all businesses work
Mike Ashley is in charge of Newcastle Utd not KK.
I personally thought a Chairmans role is to select transfer fees for ins and outs. Select ideal players to come in, then it is the managers role to manage the squad to the best of his ability.
Is this not how all businesses work
I get you now, you think I was referring to you, don't you?A lot of the time I agree with what you say, but its the fashion in the way you say it. e.g. your earlier post making it out like i'm looking for attention. You miserable, argumentitive **** :icon_bigg.
Not everything you read in Newspapers are true....
....but from what I've read...
I get you now, you think I was referring to you, don't you?
Feeling a little contradictory today are we Tamworth?
Dont get me wrong I think KK has many floors
the words out of Mike Ashleys comments are factual.
Somebody else highlights the players, the Manager then sends somebody else to look at them. That person then says if the player is good or bad, the Manager then makes his decision on that info. No brainer.I'm completely amazed at how much responsibility a manager has/should have
I would hate to be a chairman relying on one man to bring success to the club.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |