ashmeister08
Member
not in my eyes that was an utter disgrace
not in my eyes that was an utter disgrace
No they play for their wages, we go down they fcuk off. LCFC is then left with the bad players who no fecker wantsif we went down at least we would have players who play for the shirt:icon_cool
if we went down at least we would have players who play for the shirt:icon_cool
I see a defeat to the team top of the league has all the 'Holloway out' tossers back out in force.
Why do people fail to see that stability = success?
Forget the fact that the two most successful Premier League sides have kept their manager for such a long time, and take a look at the top 4 in the Championship.
Watford, Stoke, Bristol City and West Brom - sort of, have all kept their managers for a few years now, this is particularly the case for Bristol City and Stoke, as they haven't been promoted and then relegated again so haven't had the same funds.
If we give our managers time, we will improve, sacking them every 6 months is ****ing stupid and will not get us anywhere, other than into league 1.
I am fed up of coming on here and seeing so many people wanting to sack the manager, what's the ****ing point in that, we aren't going to get anybody better, and in any case with every one sacked less will want to throw themselves into a job which they'll be lucky to have in the summer, they'll go for one with more likelihood of stability in the long term.
If we sack Holloway this season it will be an absolute joke, we have ****ed up too many times now.
Rant over.
I. I know its a two thing between the players and the fans, but we need to try something to get the team playing. Any suggestions would be helpful.
I agree with everthing you said mouse. Even though we lost today, we need to keep Holloway he's a good manager. :
very low IQ's and not having a basic grasp of business and football.......
My IQ 140, buisness sense, I'm self employed, do all my own accounts, work as and when I please and earn a bloody good wedge. As for grasping football, we'd be better off with my bro' as manager. He got his pub team promoted twice in 3 seasons, regularly asking me for advice.
Maybe you should wipe the steam from your mirror and see who's face you are actually looking at !
The main chants at Watford were supporting IH.
My IQ 140, buisness sense, I'm self employed, do all my own accounts, work as and when I please and earn a bloody good wedge. As for grasping football, we'd be better off with my bro' as manager. He got his pub team promoted twice in 3 seasons, regularly asking me for advice.
Maybe you should wipe the steam from your mirror and see who's face you are actually looking at !
You are a joke surely? Joe_fox?
The main chants at Watford were supporting IH.
Why, if someone makes a comment, slagging off those of us that have a different point of view, I answer that comment with facts, You that want Holloway to stay have one argument, stability. Stability is fine if you have the right man in place. Explain to me, convince me that Holloway is the right man for our club.
As far as I can tell Ian Holloway seems to have lost the plot completely and is coming up with really bizarre excuses for loosing now. Now its the opposition having a player sent off !!!! Come on give me a break how can that attitude fix the problem. How about his team selection, tactics and motivation? Not very evident to me.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
16 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |