Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Poorly written, too, by the looks of it. City rubbing their noses in that:Ha ha!
**** you PL for your completely shit rules.
Poorly written, too, by the looks of it. City rubbing their noses in that:Ha ha!
**** you PL for your completely shit rules.
I think it's more along the lines that the the rules state shareholders should submit accounts on 30th June. But we lost our share due to relegation on 13th June, so we cannot submit accounts as we arent a shareholder anymore.So as best I can tell the very simple version is:
Premier League are allowed to penalize you for your financial year that ends on June 30th.
Leicester says you can’t assess us for that because for 7 days (June 23 - June 30) we weren’t in your jurisdiction. Maybe we would have found a 100M cheque in our couch cushions on June 26th
Courts side with Leicester.
About the measure of it?
Levels of ineptitude at the PL. Superb
I'm waiting for their post on here claiming a victory for all their hard work and effort....Stick that one on your Foxes Trust end of season survey
Twats
Yeah that's about how I see it, although not certain on the dates.So as best I can tell the very simple version is:
Premier League are allowed to penalize you for your financial year that ends on June 30th.
Leicester says you can’t assess us for that because for 7 days (June 23 - June 30) we weren’t in your jurisdiction. Maybe we would have found a 100M cheque in our couch cushions on June 26th
Courts side with Leicester.
About the measure of it?
Next step would be to sue them for damages caused by them openly threatening the club, thereby making it a less than desirable location for potential managers and players this summer.
I'm only half joking. They stitched us up.
I don't think it puts us in any stronger buying position as we clearly broke the allowed losses limit, we just got out of it on a technicality.Absolutely. Terrible shame this news didn't come a week ago, but we've got to be thankful it's come at all!!
We’ve probably breached PSR for this year with the legal costs we’re probably paying himPlayer of the Season already done and dusted - Nick de Marco KC
We’ve probably breached PSR for this year with the legal costs we’re probably paying him
technicality inbound regarding the EFL to me thinks. The EFL cannot charge us as we are not in their league and the prem does not have the jurisdiction yo enforce on behalf of another league?I don't think it puts us in any stronger buying position as we clearly broke the allowed losses limit, we just got out of it on a technicality.
We'll still have to be cautious for a while yet, as we broke the limit in 22\23, I'm fairly sure we would have done last year too and I can't see us making a fortune this year either.
It's all going to be messy for a while as one of those seasons was in the EFL, where allowed losses are lower, but then we aren't under their jurisdiction now so I don't think we can get punished for that, as long as we stay up.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 15 | 36 |
2 | Chelsea | 16 | 34 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
6 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
7 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
8 | Bournemouth | 16 | 25 |
9 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
10 | Fulham | 16 | 24 |
11 | Tottenham | 16 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 16 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
16 | Everton | 15 | 15 |
17 | Leicester | 16 | 14 |
18 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
19 | Wolves | 16 | 9 |
20 | Southampton | 16 | 5 |