pork pie fox
Well-Known Member
This is how I see it, too.I think he's a very decent plan B but I get the feeling he's a complete arsehole who nobody likes
This is how I see it, too.I think he's a very decent plan B but I get the feeling he's a complete arsehole who nobody likes
The rumour is that Vardy thinks he's a twat.I think he's a very decent plan B but I get the feeling he's a complete arsehole who nobody likes
He was quality against Porto in that 1-0 win wasn't he?I can think of far worse strikers than Slimani. The fact that he cost a ridiculous amount of money is the major problem and that wasn't his fault. I remember seeing him play very well on a number of occasions.
He wouldn't have got 9 goals this season for us. Not even close.Well with 9 goals in 19 appearances this season, he really isn't as shit as most make out on here.
Just think where we would be with another 9 goals this season......
Whereas I'm not at all convinced he's any good at either.Just to make it clear, I do genuinely believe Islam Slimani is better employed as a footballer than as a parking attendant. Now admittedly I've never seen his parking attendant skills first hand but it's a gamble I'm willing to take.
But then, as with most of what I say, it's best not to take me too seriously.
And who would you have left our for him to have scored those 9 goals?Well with 9 goals in 19 appearances this season, he really isn't as shit as most make out on here.
Just think where we would be with another 9 goals this season......
****ing hell, it's like no one has ever seen him play for us. He was absolutely woeful. I mean, appalling. He charged around like a bull with wasabi on its cock, gave away a foul and then did **** all else. I couldn't give two shiny shits if he's scored 9 goals in a pub league, he was dreadful for us from day one. It's like the Silva debate all over again. Most of us could see he was also a complete duffer but there's always those who feel they weren't 'given a proper chance'. Why do you think they weren't selected? Probably because they were as shit in training as they were on the pitch.
And who would you have left our for him to have scored those 9 goals?
Or are you hoping the referee wouldn’t notice us sticking him up top and play with 12?
That woeful that he still managed to rack up 8 goals in 15 starts.****ing hell, it's like no one has ever seen him play for us. He was absolutely woeful. I mean, appalling. He charged around like a bull with wasabi on its cock, gave away a foul and then did **** all else. I couldn't give two shiny shits if he's scored 9 goals in a pub league, he was dreadful for us from day one. It's like the Silva debate all over again. Most of us could see he was also a complete duffer but there's always those who feel they weren't 'given a proper chance'. Why do you think they weren't selected? Probably because they were as shit in training as they were on the pitch.
Ulloa is/was a much better player than Slimani.
He could have done a job on Maguire.
You always know we’re doing shit as a team when the “Slimani/Silva/Diabate is great...they could do a good job for us...they didn’t get enough of an opportunity” load of bollocks raises it’s head.
You always know we’re doing shit as a team when the “Slimani/Silva/Diabate is great...they could do a good job for us...they didn’t get enough of an opportunity” load of bollocks raises it’s head.
Jonny Hayes and Eric Odhiambo, thems was quality.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |