Mandaric interview on BBC

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
In, but being fine-tuned, I believe they said.
How can it be in but being fine tuned. I thought MM was the only one that could fine tune it, in which case it would be out, not in :102:

Unless of course the board are taking out the bits they don't like and putting in bits they do with a view to returning it to MM for approval.

To me, this all seems to be the wrong way round
 
Last edited:
Lets get this straight...

He put his first bid in
He took his first bid out
In
Out
In
Out

but has he yet shaken it all about?
 
How can it be in but being fine tuned. I thought MM was the only one that could fine tune it, in which case it would be out, not in :102:

Unless of course the board are taking out the bits they don't like and putting in bits they do with a view to returning it to MM for approval.

To me, this all seems to be the wrong way round

I would guess it's both parties taking bits out and putting bits in. As I said in an earlier post, I believe the board are trying to give MM the best chance of winning over the shareholders, and if that means rejigging the bid to try to ensure approval so be it. The last thing anyone wants is a bid to go in that will be refused by the shareholders.
 
I would guess it's both parties taking bits out and putting bits in. As I said in an earlier post, I believe the board are trying to give MM the best chance of winning over the shareholders, and if that means rejigging the bid to try to ensure approval so be it. The last thing anyone wants is a bid to go in that will be refused by the shareholders.
That's the whole problem with this process. We are now at the stage when I feel the fans should be told of proceedings. Whilst I'm certain you are right, after all it can be the only realistic scenario, we are still left guessing.

There is the understandable argument that customers shouldn't be in on the details of it's suppliers takeover. However, the customers are now getting very, very restless and impatient, and when the supplier isn't supplying it's customers with goods of merchantable quality, the customers should be given an explanation.
 
Last edited:
That's the whole problem with this process. We are now at the stage when I feel the fans should be told of proceedings. Whilst I'm certain you are right, after all it can be the only realistic scenario, we are still left guessing.

There is the understandable argument that customers shouldn't be in on the details of it's suppliers takeover. However, the customers are now getting very, very restless and impatient, and when the supplier isn't supplying it's customers with goods of merchantable quality, the customers should be given an explanation.

The takeover code and confidentiality agreements mean that neither party are supposed to say a dickie bird - sorry Melts, we'll have to continue living on conjecture, rumour and downright lies for now.;)
 
LOved what he says here to be honest. Makes great reading for our club. Kelly IS a great coach, he says it all there. Come on MM.....I like MM. Fact.
 
LOved what he says here to be honest. Makes great reading for our club. Kelly IS a great coach, he says it all there. Come on MM.....I like MM. Fact.

Is that Mammary Mammary?:icon_bigg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226

Latest posts

Back
Top