drummindefender
Active Member
same duzza but tbh it seems like we can't actually get anyone better
If Allen is appointed manager then I will support him but IMO he is the wrong choice and if he becomes manager I will give him a season and a half before fans are wanting him sacked.
The more and more I think about this the more concerns I have, when you look at the list of available and potential managers who I would have thought would view this job as a real opportunity and then look at the who Mandaric has dismissed or has let fall by the way side, I am beginning to fear that this is more down to Milan's insistence on interfering rather than anything else.
Why have so many managers who have spoken to Milan to then suddenly drop out of the reckoning. Worthington, Warnock, Coleman and Dowie all managers with premiership experience and some sort of track record have been deemed not good enough or decided there future lies elsewhere and the man identified as being the best candidate is a manager who failed to win promotion from League Two with a side boasting the highest wage budget in the division.
Looks to me that Milan is looking to appoint a yes man, someone who will accept his interference and IMO this is a recipie for disaster.
Spoken to a few people today who support other teams and none have taken the piss about Allen, their comments have all been about 'he will sort the players out' and 'expect us to be up there next season'.
They took the piss more about it could be Warcock!!
i was speaking to a forest fan last night who admitted to being envious of our situation. Said we would do well to get MA.
What a terrible image!!! :icon_eek:Better than the Elvis, kelly, hughes love triangle we had.
If you're poor and mad, you're called "mental".
If you're rich or famous and mad, you're called "eccentric".
If you're Martin Allen and you play route one, you're a "long ball merchant, terrible style of football".
If you're MON and you play route one, you're called "direct, a tactical genius".
I wanted Allen when we got Levein and I'm very pleased about this development. As for 'style of football', this is almost always a red herring - a good manager devises tactics and 'style' according to the players available to him, and to my mind any 'style' played with purpose and panache is watchable and acceptable. That does not mean 'win at all costs' including cynicism and systematic cheating, it means being competitive, playing to your strengths and never being beaten until the final whistle (and hopefully not then!)- qualities which I believe Allen to have the ability to instil.
One last thing about styles - 'glamour' clubs/managers tend to be judged by how their teams play when playing well, unglamorous ones when playing badly (us under MON, Bolton with Allardyce). And beating a more glamorous team with a headed goal is a surefire way to get labelled 'long ball' by the media.
Would agree, Russell Slade was pilloried by Grimsby fans for the 'direct' football he used here, and gave Yeovil fans loads of stick about how he was going to ruin their team. However, he got there and has continued the flowing football they have played for the last few years because he had the players to do that. So perhaps MA could do the same, given the right players, we will have to wait and see.
I havn't understood from the beggining why people on here seem to think he wont change his style to suite the players he has.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 22 | 53 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 23 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 23 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 23 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 23 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 22 | 23 |
17 | Wolves | 23 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 23 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 23 | 6 |