Mdv

[MHS]

MDV should be kept, better than Elvis.

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

But look at the upturn in results and morale after MDV, Dublin and Levein all left, if RK felt that MDV was the right sort of player then surely he wouldnt have sanctioned him moving on. IMO we have seen the last of De Vries in a Leicester shirt.

 

[newtonfox]

But look at the upturn in results and morale after MDV, Dublin and Levein all left, if RK felt that MDV was the right sort of player then surely he wouldnt have sanctioned him moving on. IMO we have seen the last of De Vries in a Leicester shirt.

`mdv went just before rk took temp charge from what i know it was done before cl was sacked ,so there could be a role for him in rk team

 

[Han]

i think he'd be a lot more effective that O'grady on the bench.

 

[PFKAKTF FOX]

`mdv went just before rk took temp charge from what i know it was done before cl was sacked ,so there could be a role for him in rk team

He played in the FA Cup match vs Southampton, which was Kelly's first match in charge and was then moved on fairly sharpish following that game.

 

[newtonfox]

i think he'd be a lot more effective that O'grady on the bench.

i would like to see him and fryatt up front only if humes out with a knock or somthing

 

[newtonfox]

He played in the FA Cup match vs Southampton, which was Kelly's first match in charge and was then moved on fairly sharpish following that game.

yes he moved on but that was the contract nothing to do with the game at all

 

[fcukcov]

i think he'd be a lot more effective that O'grady on the bench.

I think MDv's most effective position could well be on the bench.

 

[bocadillo]

I must be the only one on here who Doesn't think he's that bad...

You're not.

 

[MHS]

He isn't bad. Under-confident. We have seen what he can do, he was fantastic against Spurs. He is the kind of player who CAN change a game.

 

[bocadillo]

now the season is over here and in holland will he come back to city or are they going to keep him ,if so anyone got any idea what price we mite get for him (keep it clean plz )

I doubt very much if Heerenveen will want to keep him. He's scored three times - but every time he scores, their opponents get 4. Sounds like a bit of a Jonah!!

 

[newtonfox]

I doubt very much if Heerenveen will want to keep him. He's scored three times - but every time he scores, their opponents get 4. Sounds like a bit of a Jonah!!

but thats not his fault is it bring him back and see what rk can do with him imo carnt hurt more back up ,up front :icon_conf

 

[Redditch Fox]

MDV is by no means the worst striker we have had and is almost certainly third best to Fryatt and Hume amongst our contracted strikers. I thought it was risky to loan him out when we were in trouble and suspect we could do with him in reserve for next season.

 

[drummindefender]

i think a-z is right if rk wanted de vries he would of kept him, not loaned him out.

 

[newtonfox]

i think a-z is right if rk wanted de vries he would of kept him, not loaned him out.

rk had no say init it was a done deal before he took over fact

 

[PONTUS KAAMARK]

rk had no say init it was a done deal before he took over fact

Well why did Kelly quite blatantly say that he played a part in the decison in a press conference? It was Kellys decision to let him go.

 

[newtonfox]

Well why did Kelly quite blatantly say that he played a part in the decison in a press conference? It was Kellys decision to let him go.

because he was cl number 2 at the time and cl wanted him moved on as he knew himself that his time was limited with city at that point

that was what i was told at the time

 

[Melton Fox]

MDV was moved on within days of CL leaving, not before. If CL was still here I believe MDV would still be starting for us

 

[Boy Genius]

Rather have MDV here, than that useless tosspot Hammond

 

[Melton Fox]

Rather have MDV here, than that useless tosspot Hammond

Can't argue with that