I really don't know why he signed him.
The only thing that bothers me more is why people on here seem to rate him so highly.
Have you seen him play?
I reckon hes not match fit personally.
Not playing him helps of course.
Yes, the Madrid freindly.
And a few times on Sky.
We can't afford to play non-fit players.
And you don't think that, when playing for Sven for Man City, that he looked a good prospect?
Yes I did think he looked a good prospect.......... in 2007.
We can't afford to play non-fit players.
There are so many players ahead of him in the first team that he would have more chance of getting into the Man City 11!
Danns, King, Wellens, Fernandes, Abe, Oakley .... Johnson.
Why have we signed him then? League cup would have been perfect for him to gain his fitness, as it is he's doing feck all.
Why does it matter? He is here on loan, if he gets fit and plays, fair enough, if not we send him back to Man City, no harm done.
There is no way for him to get fit though, no reserve games, won't play him in the cup, and we can't send him out on loan.
And there is no reason why he cant reclaim that form, at the moment however, he is not match fit. Maybe he should be judged on his performances when he is fit? Oh no, hang on, we are Lestoh supporters init, we dont care that he's not fit, he didn't run his bollocks off and show pashun, he must be shit!
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 45 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 45 | 93 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 45 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 45 | 84 |
5 | Norwich City | 45 | 73 |
6 | West Brom | 45 | 72 |
7 | Hull City | 45 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 45 | 66 |
9 | Coventry City | 45 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 45 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 45 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 45 | 62 |
13 | Swansea City | 45 | 57 |
14 | Watford | 45 | 56 |
15 | Sunderland | 45 | 56 |
16 | Millwall | 45 | 56 |
17 | QPR | 45 | 53 |
18 | Stoke City | 45 | 53 |
19 | Blackburn | 45 | 50 |
20 | Sheffield W | 45 | 50 |
21 | Plymouth | 45 | 48 |
22 | Birmingham | 45 | 47 |
23 | Huddersfield | 45 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 45 | 24 |