FIF
Well-Known Member
Maybe Shakey would just like the option of playing 3 CB's next season for certain games.
sounds too logical we should go with the BN conspiracy theory.
Maybe Shakey would just like the option of playing 3 CB's next season for certain games.
I'm starting to put 2+2 together with our transfer targets. If we're seriously after another experienced central defender (especially a left sided one like Evans), I think we may be looking to play three central defenders next season. Otherwise, we're overdoing it surely?
I definitely think we're looking at 3 at the back next season when you look at who we're after/supposedly after.
Centre backs and strikers seem to the main priority, suggesting we'll still play 2 up front, but also still chasing Sigurdsson.
Whereas right back is the area we have least cover but not seen us linked to anyone.
Unless we're considering Albrighton and Simpson for the right wing back position in which case, no need for anyone else.
Mahrez always looked most dangerous when given a free role behind the strikers. If you accept him as a luxury player - periods of trying to beat three players interspersed with a bits of brilliance, he will not disappoint, particularly if he is still here trying to attract big offers.Yep agreed which is why I think we're looking at 3-5-2/3-4-3
Only question there is how you fit Gray (or Mahrez if he stays) in.
Mahrez always looked most dangerous when given a free role behind the strikers. If you accept him as a luxury player - periods of trying to beat three players interspersed with a bits of brilliance, he will not disappoint, particularly if he is still here trying to attract big offers.
I think everybody ought to accept that assumption, because he'll be gone before the window closes. Regardless of the lack of offers now, he's said he wants to go and there'll be clubs wanting him.I expect Shakespeare is preparing with the assumption that Mahrez will be gone...
Thought the Boro were being cheeky to say the least.It would appear that we have turned down an opportunity to sign Gaston Ramirez (for now).
http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/l...-10m-ramirez/story-30416203-detail/story.html
Well known that I have my doubts about Shakey,, but Mike that post is more negative than I am.It is almost surreal that we have posters who can say that So And So is not good enough to play for us now and the same player just 2 or 3 years ago would have been an extraordinary coup. We have much higher expectations of the sort of player we can attract as former Champions. Unfortunately last years slide downwards/backwards will have made many players more wary of us as not being a stable top 8 team.
Looks like Michael Keane could well be heading to Everton
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40447200
But we're stying up, right?Especially as we still seem keen on shitting money away on Jonny feckin' Evans
Depressing stuff at the moment
So why is Keane going to Everton rather than to us? We can afford a bigger fee and better wages than them.Well known that I have my doubts about Shakey,, but Mike that post is more negative than I am.
So why is Keane going to Everton rather than to us? We can afford a bigger fee and better wages than them.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |