SuperScout
Banned
I can confirm that Kasper Schmeichel was NOT on the list I sent to Sven-Goran Eriksson on Wednesday 4th May 2011. I'd say he's actually currently better than the two Goalkeepers that were on the list.
I can confirm that Kasper Schmeichel was NOT on the list I sent to Sven-Goran Eriksson on Wednesday 4th May 2011. I'd say he's actually currently better than the two Goalkeepers that were on the list.
I can confirm that Kasper Schmeichel was NOT on the list I sent to Sven-Goran Eriksson on Wednesday 4th May 2011. I'd say he's actually currently better than the two Goalkeepers that were on the list.
I can confirm that Kasper Schmeichel was NOT on the list I sent to Sven-Goran Eriksson on Wednesday 4th May 2011. I'd say he's actually currently better than the two Goalkeepers that were on the list.
I can confirm that Kasper Schmeichel was NOT on the list I sent to Sven-Goran Eriksson on Wednesday 4th May 2011. I'd say he's actually currently better than the two Goalkeepers that were on the list.
How honest of you to say so.
Now why don't you let Sven just get on with his job and not get melodramatic when he buys a player not on your list.
It may be that he knows just what he is doing!
Anyone ever told you that you are a turd?I can confirm that Kasper Schmeichel was NOT on the list I sent to Sven-Goran Eriksson on Wednesday 4th May 2011. I'd say he's actually currently better than the two Goalkeepers that were on the list.
He's made one good signing, Peltier and Danns aren't good enough.
Regardless of my previous post, can I just say I still find it highly suspicious SuperTrout is still able to post crap on here?
I thought he got banned...
Whichever mod changed his membership status is to be applauded.This has already been explained elsewhere. SuperScout was banned but the ban was temporary.
Danns - dumped by Blackburn and Birmingham, has been part of a Palace side that did nothing but decline since his arrival and the past 2 seasons have been almost relegated for **** sake! Why couldn't we go for someone like Guthrie instead, whos younger, better and has experience of getting out this league, rather than this piece of shit from Palace who will begin to depreciate in 2 years.
Whichever mod changed his membership status is to be applauded.
Whichever mod changed his membership status is to be applauded.
Lee Peltier - dumped by Liverpool, has taken him 3 years to get out of League One, was apart of a Yeovil and Huddersfield team that couldn't get out the League, Danns - dumped by Blackburn and Birmingham, has been part of a Palace side that did nothing but decline since his arrival and the past 2 seasons have been almost relegated for **** sake! Why couldn't we go for someone like Guthrie instead, whos younger, better and has experience of getting out this league, rather than this piece of shit from Palace who will begin to depreciate in 2 years.
Because we can afford him?
(our money pot is unlikely to be limitless and we may wish to spend what we have elsewhere)
(also, how can a free transfer depreciate in value?)
Because he's willing to come here?
(who is to say Guthrie would come here?)
Because he's a free agent and therefore not at a club who may not wish to sell him?
(who is to say Guthrie is available for transfer?)
Because Sven thinks he fits into his system better?
(and he's the one picking the team, not you)
I don't know the answer. You don't know the answer. Please stop.
There is justice, after all.Whichever mod changed his membership status is to be applauded.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |