Scandalous. Great article here:
http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/06/rupert-murdoch-news-of-the-world-201106
Shutting the paper down is hardly enough.
If the public react in the same way that the advertisers have, it doesn't have much of a future.
I do wonder why anybody is shocked?
We have no privacy - our personal data is being sucked from us every moment we do anything and to suppose otherwise is ridiculously naive.
What impact has this 'bugging' had? Wiped a dead girl's messages. Aside from that no one even knew it was happening.
As much as I'm moved to loathe anything remotely connected with Murdoch I also despise the sight of national hysteria. Which leaves me sitting in the middle, with a choc-ice, listening to hyperbole on 5live.
I'm not caught up in the hyperbole, but the fact that the messages were being listened to and deleted led the parents to believe their daughter was still alive as I understand it, which deserves any flack they get on its own.
I while back I had the chance to read a book ( of course I forget it's name and the author now ) detailling years of dirty tricks by the News Of The World which made my hair curl, to be honest. To paraphrase the advice of a senior executive to an new, wet behind the ears journalist, " This is what we do.........we destroy people's lives ". This was before the phone hacking saga. They deserve every once of vitriol being throw at them and more. Problem is, in a few month's time, The Sun On Sunday will be launched carrying on exactly as before. Then it will be more of the same old.I still don't get the level of vilification being dished out in their direction.
It won't be shut down though, not really. There'll be a replacement, so in effect, a rebranding of the NotW.
The Sun On Sunday will be launched carrying on exactly as before. Then it will be more of the same old.
I might get it as it could be interesting to see what they have to say.
I don't buy any papers because they are all idiotic and corrupt..
Seems a bit of a generalization.
Seems a bit of a generalization.
Massive generalisation that ignores a large section of the medium you're commenting on. This is out of character for you Beights.The problem I have is that they all seem to pander to the masses and the lowest common denominator.
The only bit Beights missed out was that the public love a good clamour as well. "Someone has to go!" they slobber with abject indignation. Whether it is phone-hacking or mass murder, it matters little to the mob.
Me? I'm more concerned about the corrupt coppers. Just not enough to be angry about it.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Manchester C | 9 | 23 |
2 | Liverpool | 9 | 22 |
3 | Arsenal | 9 | 18 |
4 | Aston Villa | 9 | 18 |
5 | Chelsea | 9 | 17 |
6 | Brighton | 9 | 16 |
7 | Nottm F | 9 | 16 |
8 | Tottenham | 9 | 13 |
9 | Brentford | 9 | 13 |
10 | Fulham | 9 | 12 |
11 | Bournemouth | 9 | 12 |
12 | Newcastle | 9 | 12 |
13 | West Ham | 9 | 11 |
14 | Manchester U | 9 | 11 |
15 | Leicester | 9 | 9 |
16 | Everton | 9 | 9 |
17 | Palace | 9 | 6 |
18 | Ipswich | 9 | 4 |
19 | Wolves | 9 | 2 |
20 | Southampton | 9 | 1 |